Assessing the energy transition in China towards carbon neutrality with a probabilistic framework

被引:40
作者
Zhang, Shu [1 ]
Chen, Wenying [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Energy Environm & Econ, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; UNCERTAINTY; EMISSIONS; IMPACTS; SECTOR; DECARBONISATION; DECARBONIZATION; POLICY; POWER;
D O I
10.1038/S41467-021-27671-0
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A profound transformation of China's energy system is required to achieve carbon neutrality. Here, we couple Monte Carlo analysis with a bottom-up energy-environment-economy model to generate 3,000 cases with different carbon peak times, technological evolution pathways and cumulative carbon budgets. The results show that if emissions peak in 2025, the carbon neutrality goal calls for a 45-62% electrification rate, 47-78% renewable energy in primary energy supply, 5.2-7.9 TW of solar and wind power, 1.5-2.7 PWh of energy storage usage and 64-1,649 MtCO(2) of negative emissions, and synergistically reducing approximately 80% of local air pollutants compared to the present level in 2050. The emission peak time and cumulative carbon budget have significant impacts on the decarbonization pathways, technology choices, and transition costs. Early peaking reduces welfare losses and prevents overreliance on carbon removal technologies. Technology breakthroughs, production and consumption pattern changes, and policy enhancement are urgently required to achieve carbon neutrality.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Integrating uncertainty into public energy research and development decisions [J].
Anadon, Laura Diaz ;
Baker, Erin ;
Bosetti, Valentina .
NATURE ENERGY, 2017, 2 (05)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Long-term low greenhouse gas emission development strategy of the European Union and its Member States
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Global Coal Plant Tracker
[5]   Combining Stochastic Optimization and Monte Carlo Simulation to Deal with Uncertainties in Climate Policy Assessment [J].
Babonneau, Frederic ;
Haurie, Alain ;
Loulou, Richard ;
Vielle, Marc .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (1-2) :51-76
[6]   Multi-criteria ranking of energy generation scenarios with Monte Carlo simulation [J].
Balezentis, Tomas ;
Streimikiene, Dalia .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 185 :862-871
[7]   Use and non-use value of nature and the social cost of carbon [J].
Bastien-Olvera, Bernardo A. ;
Moore, Frances C. .
NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 4 (02) :101-+
[8]   The global impacts of US climate policy: a model simulation using GCAM-TU and MAGICC [J].
Chen, Han ;
Wang, Lining ;
Chen, Wenying ;
Luo, Yong ;
Wang, Yu ;
Zhou, Sheng .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2018, 18 (07) :852-862
[9]   Carbon emission control strategies for China: A comparative study with partial and general equilibrium versions of the China MARKAL model [J].
Chen, Wenying ;
Wu, Zongxin ;
He, Jiankun ;
Gao, Pengfei ;
Xu, Shaofeng .
ENERGY, 2007, 32 (01) :59-72
[10]   Towards low carbon development in China: a comparison of national and global models [J].
Chen, Wenying ;
Yin, Xiang ;
Zhang, Hongjun .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2016, 136 (01) :95-108