Electrocardiographic and electrophysiological predictors of atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

被引:74
|
作者
Rivard, Lena
Schram, Gernot
Asgar, Anita
Khairy, Paul
Andrade, Jason G.
Bonan, Raoul
Dubuc, Marc
Guerra, Peter G.
Ibrahim, Reda
Macle, Laurent
Roy, Denis
Talajic, Mario
Dyrda, Katia
Shohoudi, Azadeh
de Waroux, Jean-Benoit le Polain
Thibault, Bernard
机构
[1] Montreal Heart Inst, Dept Cardiol, Montreal, PQ H1T 1C8, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Aortic valve implantation; Aortic valve; Electrophysiology study; Atrioventricular block; Pacemakers; BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK; PERMANENT PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION; CONDUCTION DISORDERS; COREVALVE PROSTHESIS; CONSENSUS DOCUMENT; RISK; BIOPROSTHESIS; REQUIREMENT; REGISTRY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.10.023
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Electrophysiological predictors of atrioventricular (AV) block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are unknown. OBJECTIVE We sought to assess the value of electrophysiology study before and after TAVR. METHODS Seventy-five consecutive pacemaker-free patients undergoing TAVR at the Montreal Heart Institute were prospectively studied. RESULTS Eleven patients (14.7%) developed AV block during the index hospitalization and 3 (4.0%) after hospital discharge over a median follow-up of 1.4 years (interguartile range 0.6-2.1 years). AV block developed in 5 of 6 patients with preprocedural right bundle branch block (83.3%), 8 of 30 patients with new-onset Left bundle branch block (LBBB; 26.7%), and 1 of 7 patients with preexisting LBBB (14.3%). In multivariate analysis that considered all patients, the delta-HV interval (HV interval after TAVR minus HV interval before TAVR) was the only factor independently associated with AV block. In the subgroup of patients with new-onset LBBB, the postprocedural HV interval was strongly associated with AV block. By receiver operating characteristic analysis, a delta-HV interval of >= 13 ms predicted AV block with 100.0% sensitivity and 84.4% specificity and an HV interval of >= 65 ms predicted AV block with 83.3% sensitivity and 81.6% specificity. In multivariate analysis, the HV interval after TAVR (hazard ratio 1.073 per ms; 95% confidence interval 1.029-1.119; P = .001) was also independently associated with all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION A prolonged delta-HV interval (>= 13 ms) is strongly associated with AV block after TAVR. In patients with new-onset LBBB after TAVR, a postprocedural HV interval of >= 65 ms is Likewise predictive of AV block.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 329
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Delayed Total Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Assessed by Implantable Loop Recorders
    Reiter, Christian
    Lambert, Thomas
    Kellermair, Joerg
    Blessberger, Hermann
    Fellner, Alexander
    Nahler, Alexander
    Grund, Michael
    Steinwender, Clemens
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 14 (24) : 2723 - 2732
  • [2] Temporal Incidence and Predictors of High-Grade Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    El-Sabawi, Bassim
    Welle, Garrett A.
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    Espinosa, Raul E.
    Gulati, Rajiv
    Sandhu, Gurpreet S.
    Greason, Kevin L.
    Crestanello, Juan A.
    Friedman, Paul A.
    Munger, Thomas M.
    Rihal, Charanjit S.
    Eleid, Mackram F.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2021, 10 (10):
  • [3] Recovery of atrioventricular conduction in patients with heart block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Raelson, Colin A.
    Gabriels, James
    Ruan, Jonathan
    Ip, James E.
    Thomas, George
    Liu, Christopher F.
    Cheung, Jim W.
    Lerman, Bruce B.
    Patel, Apoor
    Markowitz, Steven M.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 28 (10) : 1196 - 1202
  • [4] Delayed Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement The New Achilles' Heel?
    Alkhouli, Mohamad
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 14 (24) : 2733 - 2737
  • [5] An Electrocardiographic Deep Learning Model is Informative for the Prediction of Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Aggarwal, Arjun
    Mayl, Jonathan
    Butler, Liam
    Thiesfeldt, Scott
    Patel, Nisha
    Pattanaik, Sanket
    Thomas, Abigail
    Yohannan, Ethan
    Celik, Turgay
    Akbilgic, Oguz
    Bhave, Prashant
    Zhao, David X.
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [6] Atrioventricular and intraventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    Lee, Jane J.
    Goldschlager, Nora
    Mahadevan, Vaikom S.
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 52 (03) : 315 - 322
  • [7] Anatomical Predictors of Pacemaker Dependency After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Fovino, Luca Nai
    Cipriani, Alberto
    Fabris, Tommaso
    Massussi, Mauro
    Scotti, Andrea
    Lorenzoni, Giulia
    Guerra, Maria Chiara
    Cardaioli, Francesco
    Rodino, Giulio
    Matsuda, Yuji
    Masiero, Giulia
    Leoni, Loira
    Zorzi, Alessandro
    Fraccaro, Chiara
    Tarantini, Giuseppe
    CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 14 (01) : E009028
  • [8] Evaluation and Management of Heart Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Mazzella, Anthony J.
    Arora, Sameer
    Hendrickson, Michael J.
    Sanders, Mason
    Vavalle, John P.
    Gehi, Anil K.
    CARDIAC FAILURE REVIEW, 2021, 7
  • [9] Utility of 30-Day Continuous Ambulatory Monitoring to Identify Patients With Delayed Occurrence of Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Tian, Ying
    Padmanabhan, Deepak
    McLeod, Christopher J.
    Zhang, Pei
    Xiao, Peilin
    Sandhu, Gurpreet S.
    Greason, Kevin L.
    Gulati, Rajiv
    Nkomo, Vuyisile T.
    Rihal, Charanjit S.
    Polk, Lynn E.
    Sanvick, Carrie
    Liu, Xing-Peng
    Friedman, Paul A.
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (12)
  • [10] Delayed Atrioventricular Block Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika
    Eskander, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (20) : 2548 - 2549