From teacher professional development to teacher personal-professional growth: the case of expert STEM teachers

被引:3
作者
Even- Zahav, Anat [1 ,2 ]
Widder, Mirela [3 ]
Hazzan, Orit [4 ]
机构
[1] AL Qasemi Acad Coll, Sci Educ, Baqa Al Gharbiyye, Israel
[2] Kibbutzim Coll Educ Technol & Arts, Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Shaanan Acad Religious Teachers Coll, Math Educ, Haifa, Israel
[4] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Educ Sci & Technol, Haifa, Israel
关键词
Self-determination theory; teachers' professional well-being; teachers' personal-professional growth; effective teachers' professional development; expert STEM teachers; EDUCATION; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1080/13664530.2022.2052947
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Following Self-Determination Theory, scholars theorize that professional well-being is essential for teachers' satisfaction and personal-professional growth. However, teacher professional development programs (TPDPs) primarily focus on promoting student achievement and only partially and indirectly address teachers' professional well-being. The lack of teachers' voices in this discrepancy is noticeable. This study aimed at confronting teachers' perceptions about their professional well-being needs with how actual practices in effective TPDPs address these needs. Well-being components (competence, relatedness, autonomy, and aspirations) were thematically identified within 20 interviews with expert STEM teachers. The findings show that teachers attribute importance to their professional well-being in all components. In particular, aspirations for personal-professional growth, pointed out by teachers as the most important, were totally ignored by effective TPDPs. The findings emphasize the need to establish wellbeing as an additional characteristic of effective TPDPs. This additional characteristic may have practical and theoretical implications for designing and assessing TPDPs' effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 316
页数:18
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, PRINC STAND SCH MATH
[2]  
Atkinson J.W., 1974, Motivation and achievement
[3]  
Brady SP, 2019, P REL MAINT S
[4]  
Braun V., 2006, Qual Res Psychol, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, DOI 10.1080/10875549.2021.1929659, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[5]   Advancing Engineering Education in P-12 Classrooms [J].
Brophy, Sean ;
Klein, Stacy ;
Portsmore, Merredith ;
Rogers, Chris .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2008, 97 (03) :369-387
[6]  
Brown R., 2011, The Technology and Engineering Teacher, V70, P5, DOI DOI 10.1080/15391523.2016.1146563
[7]  
Carroll T., 2004, TRUE COST TEACHER TU, P16
[8]  
Charmaz K., 2014, Constructing Grounded Theory, V2nd edn
[9]   Does teacher evaluation based on student performance predict motivation, well-being, and ill-being? [J].
Cuevas, Ricardo ;
Ntoumanis, Nikos ;
Fernandez-Bustos, Juan G. ;
Bartholomew, Kimberley .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 68 :154-162
[10]  
Darling-Hammond L., 2017, Effective teacher professional development