Understanding student teachers' collaborative problem solving: Insights from an epistemic network analysis (ENA)

被引:65
作者
Zhang, Si [1 ]
Gao, Qianqian [1 ]
Sun, Mengyu [1 ]
Cai, Zhihui [2 ]
Li, Honghui [1 ]
Tang, Yanling [1 ]
Liu, Qingtang [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent China Normal Univ, Fac Artificial Intelligence Educ, Hubei Res Ctr Educ Informationizat, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
[2] Cent China Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Computer-mediated communication; Cooperative; collaborative learning; Teaching; learning strategies; Pedagogical issues; INSTRUCTIONAL-DESIGN; LEARNERS; TPACK; TASK; SELF;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104485
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Collaborative problem solving, as a key competency in the 21st century, includes both social and cognitive processes with interactive, interdependent, and periodic characteristics, so it is difficult to analyze collaborative problem solving by traditional coding and counting methods. There is a need for a new analysis approach that can capture the temporal and dynamic process of collaborative problem solving in diversity online collaborative learning context to provide some insights into online collaborative learning design. During an eight-week semester, a total of 42 student teachers participated in two online collaborative learning activities. Student teachers' discourse data were collected, and the data were coded based on a collaborative problem solving assessment model. This study used Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) to explore the collaborative problem solving processes of student teachers in different online collaborative learning tasks. The results showed that both the high and low academic performance groups worked to maintain positive communication, but the students in the high academic performance groups negotiated on ideas while the students in the low academic performance groups focused on sharing resources/ ideas. Moreover, fine-grained centroid analysis on a weekly basis showed that the high academic performance groups began by maintaining positive communication, and ended by negotiating ideas, while the low academic performance groups began by sharing resources/ideas and ended by regulating problem solving activities. Finally, the implications, limitations, and future research were discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 58 条
[51]   Technology enhanced assessment in complex collaborative settings [J].
Webb M. ;
Gibson D. .
Education and Information Technologies, 2015, 20 (4) :675-695
[52]   Pre-service teachers as members of a collaborative teacher research team: A steady track to extended professionalism? [J].
Willegems, Vicky ;
Consuegra, Els ;
Struyven, Katrien ;
Engels, Nadine .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2018, 76 :126-139
[53]   GENERATIVE PROCESSES OF COMPREHENSION [J].
WITTROCK, MC .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 1989, 24 (04) :345-376
[54]   Incorporation of Collaborative Problem Solving and Cognitive Tools to Improve Higher Cognitive Processing in Online Discussion Environments [J].
Wu, Sheng-Yi .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL COMPUTING RESEARCH, 2020, 58 (01) :249-272
[55]   Knowledge building and the quantity, content and quality of the interaction and participation of students in an online collaborative learning environment [J].
Yucel, Ummuhan Avci ;
Usluel, Yasemin Kocak .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2016, 97 :31-48
[56]   Capturing regulatory patterns in online collaborative learning: A network analytic approach [J].
Zhang, Si ;
Chen, Juan ;
Wen, Yun ;
Chen, Hongxian ;
Gao, Qianqian ;
Wang, Qiyun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, 2021, 16 (01) :37-66
[57]   Interactive networks and social knowledge construction behavioral patterns in primary school teachers' online collaborative learning activities [J].
Zhang, Si ;
Liu, Qingtang ;
Chen, Wenli ;
Wang, Qiyun ;
Huang, Zhifang .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2017, 104 :1-17
[58]  
Zheng Y., 2020, Sustainability, V12, P1