Store-and-forward teledermatology in skin cancer triage - Experience and evaluation of 2009 teleconsultations

被引:131
作者
Moreno-Ramirez, David
Ferrandiz, Lara
Nieto-Garcia, Adoracion
Carrasco, Rafael
Moreno-Alvarez, Pedro
Galdeano, Rafael
Bidegain, Esther
Rios-Martin, Juan J.
Camacho, Francisco M.
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Virgen Macarena, Pigmented Les Skin Canc & Teledermatol Clin, Seville 41009, Spain
[2] Univ Hosp Virgen Macarena, Dept Dermatol, Seville 41009, Spain
[3] Univ Hosp Virgen Macarena, Surg Area, Seville 41009, Spain
[4] Univ Hosp Virgen Macarena, Dept Pathol, Seville 41009, Spain
[5] Univ Seville, Fac Med, Dept Social & Hlth Sci, Seville, Spain
[6] Primary Care Ctr San Jose, Seville, Spain
[7] Primary Care Ctr Sevilla, Seville, Spain
[8] Primary Care Ctr Sevilla Norte, Seville, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archderm.143.4.479
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate a store-and-forward teledermatology system aimed at the routine triage of patients with skin cancer. Design: A multicenter, longitudinal, 4-phase, descriptive and evaluation study of a referred sample of patients attended through teleconsultation between March 2004 and July 2005 (n = 2009). Clinical and dermoscopical examination and histopathological study were considered the gold standard. Setting: A skin cancer unit of a public university hospital and 12 primary care centers in southern Spain. Patients: The study population comprised patients with circumscribed lesions fulfilling at least 1 of the following criteria: changes in ABCD criteria (asymmetry, border irregularity, color variegation, and diameter > 6 mm), recent history, multiple melanocytic lesions, symptoms, and/or patient's application for surgical treatment and concern about moles. Interventions: Diagnosis, diagnostic category (malignant lesions, high-risk lesions, benign lesions, special lesions, and other lesions), diagnostic confidence level on a 3-point scale, and management decision (referral vs; non-referral) were listed after the evaluation of each teleconsultation. A face-to-face evaluation and biopsy of selected patients were performed. Main Outcome Measures: The filtering percentage, as the percentage of patients not referred to the face-to-face clinic, as well as waiting intervals and pick-up or skin cancer detection rates were evaluated as effectiveness indicators. Reliability measures (kappa agreement), accuracy, and diagnostic performance indicators (validity) were also evaluated. Results: The filtering percentage was 51.20% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.00%-53.40%). The waiting interval to attend the clinic was 12.31 days (95% Cl, 8.22-16.40 days) through teledermatology and 88.62 days (95% Cl, 38.42-138.82 days; P <.001) for the letter referral system. Pick-up rates were 2.02% (95% Cl, 1.10%-2.94%) for malignant melanoma and 27.94% (95% Cl, 24.98%-30.90%) or 1:3.71 for patients with any malignant or premalignant lesion. Intraobserver agreement was kappa=0.91 (95% Cl, 0.89-0.93) for the management decision and kappa=0.95 (95% Cl, 0.94-0.96) for the diagnosis. Interobserver concordance was kappa=0.83 (95% Cl, 0.78-0.88) for the management decision and kappa=0.85 (95% Cl, 0.79-0.91) for the diagnosis. Accuracy was kappa=0.81 (95% Cl, 0.78-0.84). Sensitivity was 0.99 (95% Cl, 0.98-1.00);specificity, 0.62 (95% Cl, 0.56-0.69); pretest likelihood, 0.42 (95% Cl, 0.37-0.47); positive posttest likelihood, 0.65 (95% Cl, 0.61-0.69); and negative posttest likelihood, 0.01 (95% Cl, 0.00-0.05). Conclusion: Store-and-forward teledermatology has demonstrated in this series to be an effective, accurate, reliable, and valid approach for the routine management of patient referrals in skin cancer and pigmented lesion clinics.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 484
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   SCREENING FOR MELANOMA AND SKIN-CANCER [J].
ARUNDELL, FD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1986, 255 (18) :2443-2444
[2]   Towards complete and,accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCE .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7379) :41-44
[3]   Evaluation of the UK 2-week referral rule for skin cancer [J].
Cox, NH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2004, 150 (02) :291-298
[4]  
Department of Health, 1997, NEW NHS MOD DEP
[5]  
ESCUDERO J, CANC PIEL PROCESO AS
[6]  
Gibbon KL, 1998, CLIN EXP DERMATOL, V23, P3
[7]   Realtime teleconsultations versus face-to-face consultations in dermatology: immediate and six-month outcome [J].
Granlund, H ;
Thoden, CJ ;
Carlson, C ;
Harno, K .
JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2003, 9 (04) :204-209
[8]   Teledermatology - high technology or not? [J].
Harrison, PV ;
Kirby, B ;
Dickinson, Y ;
Schofield, R .
JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 1998, 4 :31-32
[9]   Telemedicine versus in-person dermatology referrals: An analysis of case complexity [J].
Krupinski, E ;
Barker, G ;
Rodriguez, G ;
Engstrom, M ;
Levine, N ;
Lopez, AM ;
Weinstein, RS .
TELEMEDICINE JOURNAL AND E-HEALTH, 2002, 8 (02) :143-147
[10]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174