Predicting place attachment among walkers in the urban context: The role of dogs, motivations, satisfaction, past experience and setting development

被引:18
作者
Arnberger, Arne [1 ]
Budruk, Megha [2 ]
Schneider, Ingrid E. [3 ]
Stanis, Sonja A. Wilhelm [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Inst Landscape Dev Recreat & Conservat Planning, Dept Spatial Landscape & Infrastruct Sci, Vienna, Austria
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Community Resources & Dev, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Forest Resources, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Univ Missouri, Sch Nat Resources, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
Dog ownership; Dog walking; Place dependence; Solitude; Urban green space; Walking; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; USE HISTORY; RECREATION; PARKS; PREFERENCES; PERCEPTIONS; OWNERSHIP; COMMUNITY; WALKING; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127531
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Place attachment knowledge informs urban green space management to maximize positive visitor experiences. However, little is known about how place attachment differs between urban green space settings and users, particularly dog walkers or owners. This study explored place attachment and the better-known influence of variables such as motivation, satisfaction and visit frequency, as well as the understudied contributions of dog ownership status and degree of setting development. In total, 450 on-site walkers and dog walkers in two cities and four green spaces with different levels of development were interviewed. Regression analyses revealed motivations, satisfaction and visit frequency predicted place attachment. Place attachment strength differed between walkers and dog walkers: dog walkers were more likely to have higher place identity and place dependence. Similarly, visitors to the urban green spaces with the lowest degree of development were highest on place dependence and identity. Implications and future research ideas are shared.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Arnberger Arne, 2006, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, V4, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.004
[2]  
Arnberger Arne, 2003, Journal for Nature Conservation (Jena), V11, P260, DOI 10.1078/1617-1381-00057
[3]   Day Tourism or Residential Environment Use? A Comparison of the Visit 's Intensity and Pattern of three Recreation and Protection Areas in Vienna [J].
Arnberger, Arne ;
Eder, Renate ;
Preisel, Hemma .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR TOURISMUSWISSENSCHAFT, 2016, 8 (02) :199-221
[4]   Are urban visitors' general preferences for green-spaces similar to their preferences when seeking stress relief? [J].
Arnberger, Arne ;
Eder, Renate .
URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2015, 14 (04) :872-882
[5]  
AVMA (American Veterinary Medical Association), 2017, U.S. pet ownership statistics
[6]   Characteristics of urban parks and their relation to user well-being [J].
Ayala-Azcarraga, Cristina ;
Diaz, Daniel ;
Zambrano, Luis .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2019, 189 :27-35
[7]   Dog eat dog world: public consultation and planning on contested landscapes, a case study of dog parks and municipal government [J].
Booth, Annie L. .
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 2017, 52 (02) :337-353
[8]  
Bricker KS, 2000, LEISURE SCI, V22, P233, DOI 10.1080/01490409950202285
[9]   Crowding and experience-use history: A study of the moderating effect of place attachment among water-based recreationists [J].
Budruk, Megha ;
Stanis, Sonja A. Wilhem ;
Schneider, Ingrid E. ;
Heisey, Jennifer J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 41 (04) :528-537
[10]   Place attachment and recreation experience preference: A further exploration of the relationship [J].
Budruk, Megha ;
Stanis, Sonja A. Wilhelm .
JOURNAL OF OUTDOOR RECREATION AND TOURISM-RESEARCH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 1-2 :51-61