Immunogenicity of Golimumab and its Clinical Relevance in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

被引:16
作者
Adedokun, Omoniyi J. [1 ]
Gunn, George R., III [1 ,2 ]
Leu, Jocelyn H. [1 ]
Gargano, Cynthia [1 ]
Xu, Zhenhua [1 ]
Sandborn, William J. [3 ]
Rutgeerts, Paul [4 ]
Shankar, Gopi [1 ]
机构
[1] Janssen Res & Dev LLC, 1400 McKean Rd, Spring House, PA 19477 USA
[2] GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[4] Univ Hosp Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
golimumab; bridging enzyme immunoassay; antidrug antibodies; INDUCTION THERAPY; HOST ANTIBODIES; CROHNS-DISEASE; INFLIXIMAB; DRUG; PHARMACOKINETICS; RECOMMENDATIONS; ASSOCIATION; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1093/ibd/izz003
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Antidrug antibody (ADA) detection with standard bridging enzyme immunoassays (EIA) can yield false-negative results or underestimate titers through drug interference. A more sensitive assay was needed to determine clinical impact of antigolimumab antibodies. Methods: A high-sensitivity, drug-tolerant EIA (DT-EIA) was developed and cross-validated against the original EIA, and samples from induction/maintenance studies in golimumab-treated patients with ulcerative colitis were analyzed for ADAs using both methods. Immunogenicity results were compared, and pharmacokinetic, efficacy, and safety associations were evaluated. Results: An 8-fold increase in ADA-positive patients (21.8% DT-EIA vs 2.8% EIA) reflected DT-EIA improved sensitivity and drug tolerance. Most newly detected ADA-positive patients (using DT-EIA) had low antibody titers, whereas most with high antibody titers were ADA-positive with original EIA. With DT-EIA, week 44 median trough serum golimumab concentrations among ADA-positive patients were approximately half vs ADA-negative (0.51 vs 0.85 mu g/mL [50 mg q4w]; 0.85 vs 1.60 mu g/mL [100 mg q4w]). Antidrug antibody impact on golimumab concentrations was more notable at titers >= 1:100. During induction, ADAs had no notable impact on efficacy. During maintenance, proportions of patients maintaining clinical response through week 54 were lower using DT-EIA: 38.1% ADA-positive and 52.8% ADA-negative. Antidrug antibody status had no impact on injection-site reaction incidence. Conclusions: A more sensitive DT-EIA identified higher proportions of ADA-positive patients. A trend of decreasing drug concentrations with increasing ADA titers was observed. Pharmacokinetic impact was better elucidated with DT-EIA. Although development of ADA did not preclude efficacy, a trend toward decreased efficacy in ADA-positive vs ADA-negative patients was observed during maintenance treatment. Antidrug antibody status did not impact safety.
引用
收藏
页码:1532 / 1540
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[31]   Levels of Drug and Antidrug Antibodies Are Associated With Outcome of Interventions After Loss of Response to Infliximab or Adalimumab [J].
Yanai, Henit ;
Lichtenstein, Lev ;
Assa, Amit ;
Mazor, Yoav ;
Weiss, Batia ;
Levine, Arie ;
Ron, Yulia ;
Kopylov, Uri ;
Bujanover, Yoram ;
Rosenbach, Yoram ;
Ungar, Bella ;
Eliakim, Rami ;
Chowers, Yehuda ;
Shamir, Raanan ;
Fraser, Gerald ;
Dotan, Iris ;
Ben-Horin, Shomron .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 13 (03) :522-530
[32]   Assessing Response and Loss of Response to Biological Therapies in IBD [J].
Yanai, Henit ;
Hanauer, Stephen B. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 106 (04) :685-698