Assessment of anisotropic minimum-dissipation (AMD) subgrid-scale model: Gently-curved backward-facing step flow

被引:22
作者
Zahiri, Amir-Pouyan [1 ]
Roohi, Ehsan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Xian Jiaotong Univ XJTU, Int Ctr Appl Mech ICAM, Sch Aerosp Engn, State Key Lab Strength & Vibrat Mech Struct, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[2] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Dept Mech Engn, POB 91775-1111, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS C | 2021年 / 32卷 / 05期
关键词
Large eddy simulation (LES); anisotropic minimum-dissipation (AMD) model; subgrid-scale model (SGS); Dynamic Smagorinsky model (DSM); backward-facing step (BFS); LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; ROUND SYNTHETIC JETS; TURBULENCE; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1142/S0129183121500686
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The impetus of this study is to evaluate the performance of the anisotropic minimum-dissipation (AMD) subgrid-scale model (SGS) for flow over a gently-curved backward-facing step (BFS) at a Reynolds number of 13 700. Minimum-dissipation sub-grid models were developed as simple alternatives to the dynamic eddy-viscosity SGS models. AMD model is a static type of eddy-viscosity SGS model incorporating anisotropic SGS effects into numerical predictions through the large-eddy simulation (LES) approach. The open-source CFD package of OpenFOAM was used to implement the AMD model. Before focusing on the BFS flow, we investigated the impact of the AMD model coefficient magnitude on the numerical predictions of the decaying isotropic turbulence flow. In the next step, numerical solutions were obtained for the curved backward-facing step using the AMD model and Dynamic Smagorinsky model (DSM). The curved backward-facing step was considered here for the evaluation of the SGS model predictions due to its weak adverse pressure gradient and high sensitive flow mechanism. The rescaling/recycling method was employed as a turbulent inflow generation technique. The AMD model results were compared with the prediction of the DSM and Vreman model. Moreover, AMD model predictions were compared with the reported solutions obtained using different turbulent inflow generation methods. The assessments revealed the high capability of the AMD model to capture decaying turbulence and predict velocity profiles and resolved flow statistics turbulent parameters in the gently-curved backward step flow.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Minimum-dissipation scalar transport model for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows [J].
Abkar, Mahdi ;
Bae, Hyun J. ;
Moin, Parviz .
PHYSICAL REVIEW FLUIDS, 2016, 1 (04)
[2]   Assessment of four inflow conditions on large-eddy simulation of a gently curved backward-facing step [J].
Asgari, Ehsan ;
Tadjfar, Mehran .
JOURNAL OF TURBULENCE, 2017, 18 (01) :61-86
[3]  
Baya Toda H, 2010, P SUMMER PROGRAM 201, P193
[4]   Large-eddy simulation of turbulent boundary layer separation from a rounded step [J].
Bentaleb, Yacine ;
Lardeau, Sylvain ;
Leschziner, Michael A. .
JOURNAL OF TURBULENCE, 2012, 13 (04) :1-28
[5]   A multiscale subgrid model for both free vortex flows and wall-bounded flows [J].
Bricteux, L. ;
Duponcheel, M. ;
Winckelmans, G. .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2009, 21 (10)
[6]   SIMPLE EULERIAN TIME CORRELATION OF FULL- AND NARROW-BAND VELOCITY SIGNALS IN GRID-GENERATED, ISOTROPIC TURBULENCE [J].
COMTEBELLOT, G ;
CORRSIN, S .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1971, 48 (JUL28) :273-+
[7]   A NUMERICAL STUDY OF 3 DIMENSIONAL TURBULENT CHANNEL FLOW AT LARGE REYNOLDS NUMBERS [J].
DEARDORFF, JW .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1970, 41 :453-+
[8]   Mathematical and physical constraints on large-eddy simulations [J].
Fureby, C ;
Tabor, G .
THEORETICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS, 1997, 9 (02) :85-102
[9]   Large Eddy simulation of high-Reynolds-number free and wall-bounded flows [J].
Fureby, C ;
Grinstein, FF .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2002, 181 (01) :68-97
[10]   A DYNAMIC SUBGRID-SCALE EDDY VISCOSITY MODEL [J].
GERMANO, M ;
PIOMELLI, U ;
MOIN, P ;
CABOT, WH .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS A-FLUID DYNAMICS, 1991, 3 (07) :1760-1765