Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Semi-Prone Position (Pawar Technique): Technical Aspects and Outcome in 224 Patients

被引:4
作者
Pawar, Suraj B. [1 ]
Bagul, Kiran G. [1 ]
Anap, Yogesh S. [2 ]
Tanawade, Prasad K. [2 ]
Mane, Ashwini [3 ]
Patil, Snehdeep S. [4 ]
Pawar, Reshma S. [1 ]
Kulkarni, Shubham S. [5 ]
Pawar, Aditya S. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Kolhapur Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, RS 238, Kolhapur 416234, Maharashtra, India
[2] Kolhapur Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India
[3] Kolhapur Canc Ctr, Dept Oncopathol, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India
[4] DY Patil Med Coll, Dept Community Med, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India
[5] RCSM Med Coll & CPR Hosp, Dept Med, Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India
[6] HBT Med Coll, Dept Med, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[7] Dr RN Cooper Municipal Gen Hosp, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
关键词
thoracoscopic surgery; minimally invasive surgery; esophagectomy; patient positioning; THORACOSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY; TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY; LATERAL DECUBITUS; EXPERIENCE; MOBILIZATION; THORACOLAPAROSCOPY; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1055/s-0041-1726164
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives There are two patient positions described for minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer, viz., left lateral and prone positions. To retain the benefits and overcome the disadvantages of these positions, a semi-prone position was developed by us. Our objective was to analyze the feasibility of performing MIE in this position. Materials and Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent MIE at our center from January 2007 to December 2017 was done. A semi-prone position is a left lateral position with an anterior inclination of 45 degrees. Intraoperative parameters including conversion rate, immediate postoperative outcomes, and long-term oncological outcomes were analyzed. Statistical Analysis Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 19 (IBM SPSS, IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) was utilized for analysis. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier graph. Quantitative data were described as mean or median with standard deviation, and qualitative data were described as frequency distribution tables. Results Consecutive 224 patients with good performance status were included. After excluding those who required conversion (14 [6.6%]), 210 patients were further analyzed. Median age was 60 years (range: 27-80 years). Neoadjuvant treatment recipients were 160 (76%) patients. Most common presentation was squamous cell carcinoma (146 [70%]) of lower third esophagus (140 [67%]) of stage III (126 [60%]). Median blood loss for thoracoscopic dissection and for total operation was 101.5 mL (range: 30-180 mL) and 286 mL (range: 93-480 mL), respectively. Median operative time for thoracoscopic dissection alone was 67 minutes (range: 34-98 minutes) and for entire procedure was 215 minutes (range: 162-268 minutes). There was no intraoperative mortality. Median 16 lymph nodes were dissected (range: 5-32). Postoperative complication rate and mortality was 50% and 3.3%, respectively. Disease-free interval was 18 months (range: 3-108 months) and overall survival was 22 months (range: 6-108 months). Conclusion MIE with mediastinal lymphadenectomy in a semi-prone position is feasible, convenient, oncologically safe, which can combine the benefits of the two conventional approaches. Further prospective and comparative studies are required to support our findings.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 221
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic oesophagectomy improves the quality of extended lymphadenectomy
    Cadiere, G. B.
    Torres, R.
    Dapri, G.
    Capelluto, E.
    Hainaux, B.
    Himpens, J.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2006, 20 (08): : 1308 - 1309
  • [2] Cuschieri A, 1994, Endosc Surg Allied Technol, V2, P21
  • [3] Cuschieri A, 1992, J R Coll Surg Edinb, V37, P7
  • [4] Denewer A, 2014, SURG SCI, V5, P214
  • [5] Dexter SPL, 1996, SURG ENDOSC-ULTRAS, V10, P147
  • [6] Prone thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for minimally invasive esophagectomy
    Fabian, T.
    McKelvey, A. A.
    Kent, M. S.
    Federico, J. A.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2007, 21 (09): : 1667 - 1670
  • [7] Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
    Law, S
    Fok, M
    Chu, EM
    Wong, J
    [J]. SURGERY, 1997, 122 (01) : 8 - 14
  • [8] Thoracoscopic oesophageal mobilization during thoracolaparoscopy three-stage oesophagectomy: a comparison of lateral decubitus versus semiprone positions
    Lin, Jiangbo
    Kang, Mingqiang
    Chen, Chun
    Lin, Ruobai
    [J]. INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 17 (05) : 829 - 834
  • [9] International Consensus on Standardization of Data Collection for Complications Associated With Esophagectomy Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG)
    Low, Donald E.
    Alderson, Derek
    Cecconello, Ivan
    Chang, Andrew C.
    Darling, Gail E.
    D'Journo, Xavier Benoit
    Griffin, S. Michael
    Hoelscher, Arnulf H.
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Jobe, Blair A.
    Kitagawa, Yuko
    Kucharczuk, John C.
    Law, Simon Ying Kit
    Lerut, Toni E.
    Maynard, Nick
    Pera, Manuel
    Peters, Jeffrey H.
    Pramesh, C. S.
    Reynolds, John V.
    Smithers, B. Mark
    van Lanschot, J. Jan B.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 262 (02) : 286 - 294
  • [10] Minimally invasive esophagectomy - Outcomes in 222 patients
    Luketich, JD
    Alvelo-Rivera, M
    Buenaventura, PO
    Christie, NA
    McCaughan, JS
    Litle, VR
    Schauer, PR
    Close, JM
    Fernando, HC
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2003, 238 (04) : 486 - 494