Economic Inequality and the Value of Nature

被引:33
作者
Drupp, Moritz A. [1 ,2 ]
Meya, Jasper N. [3 ,4 ]
Baumgaertner, Stefan [5 ]
Quaas, Martin F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Dept Econ, Von Melle Pk 5, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Kiel, Dept Econ, Kiel, Germany
[3] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, Dept Econ, Oldenburg, Germany
[4] Humboldt Univ, Resource Econ Grp, Berlin, Germany
[5] Univ Freiburg, Dept Environm & Nat Resources, Freiburg, Germany
关键词
Distribution; Environmental goods; Income inequality; Nature conservation; Valuation; Willingness to pay; BENEFIT-COST-ANALYSIS; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; DISTRIBUTIONAL WEIGHTS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; VALUATION; SUBSTITUTABILITY; SUSTAINABILITY; CLIMATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.029
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Understanding what influences the value of nature is crucial for informing environmental policy. From a sustainability perspective, economic valuation should not only seek to determine a society's willingness to pay for environmental goods to devise an efficient allocation of scarce resources, but should also account for distributional effects to ensure justice. Yet, how economic inequality affects the value of non-market environmental goods remains understudied. Combining recently developed theoretical results with empirical evidence, this Commentary shows that more equal societies have a higher valuation for environmental public goods and that non-market benefits of environmental policy accrue over-proportionally to poorer households. On this ground, we discuss implications for environmental valuation, management and policy-making and identify a number of fruitful areas for future research. We conclude that environmental valuation should explicitly account for economic inequality, and that encompassing assessments of the distributional effects of environmental policies must consider the distribution of non-market environmental benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 345
页数:11
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Benefit-Cost Analysis and Distributional Weights: An Overview [J].
Adler, Matthew D. .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2016, 10 (02) :264-285
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, DOI DOI 10.1119/1.2344558
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Centre for Opportunity and Equality, V24, P1
[4]   Equity weighting and the marginal damage costs of climate change [J].
Anthoff, David ;
Hepburn, Cameron ;
Tol, Richard S. J. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (03) :836-849
[5]   Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis [J].
Atkinson, Giles ;
Mourato, Susana .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2008, 33 :317-344
[6]  
Barbier Edward., 2009, Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective.
[7]   Is the Income Elasticity of the Willingness to Pay for Pollution Control Constant? [J].
Barbier, Edward B. ;
Czajkowski, Mikoaj ;
Hanley, Nick .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2017, 68 (03) :663-682
[9]   Bringing Ecosystem Services into Economic Decision-Making: Land Use in the United Kingdom [J].
Bateman, Ian J. ;
Harwood, Amii R. ;
Mace, Georgina M. ;
Watson, Robert T. ;
Abson, David J. ;
Andrews, Barnaby ;
Binner, Amy ;
Crowe, Andrew ;
Day, Brett H. ;
Dugdale, Steve ;
Fezzi, Carlo ;
Foden, Jo ;
Hadley, David ;
Haines-Young, Roy ;
Hulme, Mark ;
Kontoleon, Andreas ;
Lovett, Andrew A. ;
Munday, Paul ;
Pascual, Unai ;
Paterson, James ;
Perino, Grischa ;
Sen, Antara ;
Siriwardena, Gavin ;
van Soest, Daan ;
Termansen, Mette .
SCIENCE, 2013, 341 (6141) :45-50
[10]   Income inequality and willingness to pay for environmental public goods [J].
Baumgaertner, Stefan ;
Drupp, Moritz A. ;
Meya, Jasper N. ;
Munz, Jan M. ;
Quaas, Martin F. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 85 :35-61