Is there an environmentally optimal separate collection rate?

被引:30
作者
Haupt, M. [1 ]
Waser, E. [1 ]
Wurmli, J. C. [2 ]
Hellweg, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Engn, John von Neumann Weg 9, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Verein PRS PET Recycling Schweiz, Naglerwiesenstr 4, CH-8049 Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Recycling; PET bottles; Collection rate; Non-linear effects; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Marginal environmental benefit; WASTE MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.050
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Material recycling often leads to environmental benefits when compared to thermal treatments or land filling and is therefore positioned in the waste hierarchy as the third priority after waste prevention and reuse. To assess the environmental impacts of recycling and the related substitution of primary material, linear steady-state models of physical flows are typically used. In reality, the environmental burdens of collection and recycling are likely to be a non-linear function of the collection rate. This short communication aims at raising awareness of the non-linear effects in separate collection systems and presents the first non-linear quantitative model for PET bottle recycling. The influence of collection rates on the material quality and the transport network is analyzed based on the data collected from industrial partners. The results highlight that in the present Swiss recycling system a very high collection rate close to 100% yields optimum environmental benefits with respect to global warming. The empirical data, however, provided indications for a decrease in the marginal environmental benefit of recycling. This can be seen as an indication that tipping points may exist for other recycling systems, in which the environmental benefits from substituting primary materials are less pronounced than they are for PET. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 224
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, ACT PLAN ORG PROD EU
[3]   Recycling of plastic: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions [J].
Astrup, Thomas ;
Fruergaard, Thilde ;
Christensen, Thomas H. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2009, 27 (08) :763-772
[4]  
Bunge R., 2015, METENVIRO LIMITS MET
[5]  
Daehn K. E., 2017, ENV SCI TECHNOL
[6]  
Dinkel F, 2008, OKOLOGISCHER NUTZEN
[7]   What life-cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management [J].
Ekvall, Tomas ;
Assefa, Getachew ;
Bjorklund, Anna ;
Eriksson, Ola ;
Finnveden, Goran .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 27 (08) :989-996
[8]  
Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN), 2017, ABF REC 2015 UB
[9]  
FOEN, 2013, REC GETR 2012
[10]  
Guinee J.B., 2004, HDB LIFE CYCLE ASSES, DOI DOI 10.1007/0-306-48055-7