Effect of passive uterine straightening during embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:18
作者
Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.
机构
[1] Pyramids, Giza, 5, El-Ashwal Street, Pyramids Road
关键词
embryo transfer; bladder distention; meta-analysis; in vitro fertilisation;
D O I
10.1080/00016340701252126
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background. Part of the success of ultrasound-guided embryo transfer has been associated with the beneficial effect of uterine straightening by passive bladder distention. Even so, this has not been properly analysed in the literature. Methods. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective, randomised, controlled trials, comparing embryo transfer with a full versus empty bladder. Electronic (e.g. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library) and hand searches were performed to locate trials. Primary outcomes were live-birth, ongoing and clinical pregnancy rates. Secondary outcomes were rates of implantation, miscarriage, multiple and ectopic pregnancies, and retained embryos. Also, the ease of transfer, need for instrumental assistance, and presence of blood on the catheter tip were evaluated. Four studies were identified, of which 1 study was excluded. Meta-analysis was conducted with the Mantel-Haenszel method, utilising the fixed-effect model. Results. For the primary outcome measures, no data was available for the LBR rate. There was a significantly higher chance of an ongoing pregnancy [OR = 1.44 (95% CI = 1.04-2.04)] and clinical pregnancy [OR = 1.55 (95% CI = 1.16-2.08)] with a full bladder. For the secondary outcomes, there was a significantly greater incidence of difficulty, or need for instrumental assistance, with an empty bladder. Other outcome measures were not significantly different. Conclusion. There is evidence in the literature advising to fill the bladder prior to embryo transfer.
引用
收藏
页码:516 / 522
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis using direct and adjusted indirect comparisons [J].
Abou-Setta, AM .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2006, 12 (02) :191-198
[2]   Soft versus firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Abou-Setta, AM ;
Al-Inany, HG ;
Mansour, RT ;
Serour, GI ;
Aboulghar, MA .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (11) :3114-3121
[3]  
ABOUSETTA AM, 2007, IN PRESS FERTIL STER
[4]  
ALINANY HG, 2006, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD005636
[5]   The presence of blood in the transfer catheter negatively influences outcome at embryo transfer [J].
Alvero, R ;
Hearns-Stokes, RM ;
Catherino, WH ;
Leondires, MP ;
Segars, JH .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 (09) :1848-1852
[6]   FACTORS INFLUENCING PUBLICATION OF RESEARCH RESULTS - FOLLOW-UP OF APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED TO 2 INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS [J].
DICKERSIN, K ;
MIN, YI ;
MEINERT, CL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 267 (03) :374-378
[7]   PUBLICATION BIAS IN CLINICAL RESEARCH [J].
EASTERBROOK, PJ ;
BERLIN, JA ;
GOPALAN, R ;
MATTHEWS, DR .
LANCET, 1991, 337 (8746) :867-872
[8]   Clinical approaches to increasing uterine receptivity during human implantation [J].
Edwards, RG .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 :60-66
[9]  
Egbase PE, 1996, HUM REPROD, V11, P1687
[10]  
Friedler S, 1993, J Assist Reprod Genet, V10, P393, DOI 10.1007/BF01228088