Arsenic release from Floridan Aquifer rock during incubations simulating aquifer storage and recovery operations

被引:12
|
作者
Jin, Jin [1 ]
Zimmerman, Andrew R. [1 ]
Norton, Stuart B. [2 ]
Annable, Michael D. [3 ]
Harris, Willie G. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Geol Sci, 241 Williamson Hall,POB 112120, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Florida Geol Survey, 3000 Commonwealth Blvd, Tallahassee, FL 32303 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Environm Engn Sci, 217 AP Black Hall,POB 116450, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[4] Univ Florida, Dept Soil & Water Sci, 2181 McCarty Hall,POB 110290, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
Arsenic; Dissolved organic matter (DOM); Aquifer storage and recovery (ASR); Groundwater; Floridan Aquifer; Carbonate rocks; NATURAL ORGANIC-MATTER; CONTAMINATED SOILS; WATER-QUALITY; GROUNDWATER; BANGLADESH; MOBILITY; MOBILIZATION; SEDIMENTS; BEHAVIOR; SORPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.028
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) is becoming widely accepted as a way to address water supply shortages, there are concerns that it may lead to release of harmful trace elements such as arsenic (As). Thus, mechanisms of As release from limestone during ASR operations were investigated using 110-day laboratory incubations of core material collected from the Floridan Aquifer, with treatment additions of labile or refractory dissolved organic matter (DOM) or microbes. During the first experimental phase, core materials were equilibrated with native groundwater lacking in DO to simulate initial non-perturbed anaerobic aquifer conditions. Then, ASR was simulated by replacing the native groundwater in the incubations vessels with DO-rich ASR source water, with DOM or microbes added to some treatments. Finally, the vessels were opened to the atmosphere to mimic oxidizing conditions during later stages of ASR. Arsenic was released from aquifer materials, mainly during transitional periods at the beginning of each incubation stage. Most As released was during the initial anaerobic experimental phase via reductive dissolution of Fe oxides in the core materials, some or all of which may have formed during the core storage or sample preparation period. Oxidation of As-bearing Fe sulfides released smaller amounts of As during the start of later aerobic experimental phases. Additions of labile DOM fueled microbially-mediated reactions that mobilized As, while the addition of refractory DOM did not, probably due to mineral sorption of DOM that made it unavailable for microbial utilization or metal chelation. The results suggest that oscillations of groundwater redox conditions, such as might be expected to occur during an ASR operation, are the underlying cause of enhanced As release in these systems. Further, ASR operations using DOM-rich surface waters may not necessarily lead to additional As releases. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 245
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hydraulic Fracturing of the Floridan Aquifer from Aquifer Storage and Recovery Operations
    Geibel, Nicholas M.
    Brown, Christopher J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING GEOSCIENCE, 2012, 18 (02): : 175 - 189
  • [2] Arsenic Control During Aquifer Storage Recovery Cycle Tests in the Floridan Aquifer
    Mirecki, June E.
    Bennett, Michael W.
    Lopez-Balaez, Marie C.
    GROUND WATER, 2013, 51 (04) : 539 - 549
  • [3] The arsenic problem during Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR)
    Pichler, T
    Arthur, JD
    Price, RE
    Jones, GW
    GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2004, 68 (11) : A520 - A520
  • [4] Water quality requirements for sustaining aquifer storage and recovery operations in a low permeability fractured rock aquifer
    Page, Declan
    Miotlinski, Konrad
    Dillon, Peter
    Taylor, Russel
    Wakelin, Steve
    Levett, Kerry
    Barry, Karen
    Pavelic, Paul
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 92 (10) : 2410 - 2418
  • [5] Arsenic mobility and impact on recovered water quality during aquifer storage and recovery using reclaimed water in a carbonate aquifer
    Vanderzalm, J. L.
    Dillon, P. J.
    Barry, K. E.
    Miotlinski, K.
    Kirby, J. K.
    La Salle, C. Le Gal
    APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 2011, 26 (12) : 1946 - 1955
  • [6] Nutrient Removal during Stormwater Aquifer Storage and Recovery in an Anoxic Carbonate Aquifer
    Vanderzalm, Joanne L.
    Page, Declan W.
    Dillon, Peter J.
    Barry, Karen E.
    Gonzalez, Dennis
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2018, 47 (02) : 276 - 286
  • [7] Solute changes during aquifer storage recovery testing in a limestone clastic aquifer
    Mirecki, JE
    Campbell, BG
    Conlon, KJ
    Petkewich, MD
    GROUND WATER, 1998, 36 (03) : 394 - 403
  • [8] Solute changes during aquifer storage recovery testing in a limestone/clastic aquifer
    Department of Geology, University of Charleston, Charleston, SC 29424, United States
    不详
    Ground Water, 3 (394-403):
  • [9] Mobilization of arsenic during one-year incubations of grey aquifer sands from Araihazar, Bangladesh
    Radloff, Kathleen A.
    Cheng, Zhongqi
    Rahman, Mohammad W.
    Ahmed, Kazi M.
    Mailloux, Brian J.
    Juhl, Andrew R.
    Schlosser, Peter
    van Geen, Alexander
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 41 (10) : 3639 - 3645
  • [10] Optimizing Aquifer Storage and Recovery Wellfield Operations to Minimize Energy Consumption
    Alqahtani, Abdulaziz
    Sale, Tom
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 146 (08)