NHF-McMaster Guideline on Care Models for Haemophilia Management

被引:48
作者
Pai, M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Key, N. S. [4 ]
Skinner, M. [5 ]
Curtis, R. [6 ]
Feinstein, M. [7 ]
Kessler, C. [8 ]
Lane, S. J. [3 ]
Makris, M. [9 ]
Riker, E. [7 ]
Santesso, N. [10 ]
Soucie, J. M. [11 ]
Yeung, C. H. T. [10 ]
Iorio, A. [1 ,10 ]
Schunemann, H. J. [10 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Pathol & Mol Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, McMaster Ctr Transfus Res, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[5] Inst Policy Adv Ltd, Washington, DC USA
[6] Factor VIII Comp, Berkeley, CA USA
[7] Natl Hemophilia Fdn, New York, NY USA
[8] Georgetown Univ, Washington, DC USA
[9] Univ Sheffield, Dept Infect Immun & Cardiovasc Dis, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[10] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[11] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Ctr Birth Defects & Dev Disabil, Div Blood Disorders, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
care model; delivery of health care; guideline; haemophilia; health care team; integrated care; COMPREHENSIVE CARE; GRADING QUALITY; RECOMMENDATIONS; PRINCIPLES; STRENGTH; PROMOTE; PEOPLE; MALES; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/hae.13008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This guideline was developed to identify evidence-based best practices in haemophilia care delivery, and discuss the range of care providers and services that are most important to optimize outcomes for persons with haemophilia (PWH) across the United States. The guideline was developed following specific methods described in detail in this supplement and based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach). Direct evidence from published literature and the haemophilia community, as well as indirect evidence from other chronic diseases, were reviewed, synthesized and applied to create evidence-based recommendations. The Guideline panel suggests that the integrated care model be used over non-integrated care models for PWH (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty in the evidence). For PWH with inhibitors and those at high risk for inhibitor development, the same recommendation was graded as strong, with moderate certainty in the evidence. The panel suggests that a haematologist, a specialized haemophilia nurse, a physical therapist, a social worker and round-the-clock access to a specialized coagulation laboratory be part of the integrated care team, over an integrated care team that does not include all of these components (conditional recommendation, very low certainty in the evidence). Based on available evidence, the integrated model of care in its current structure, is suggested for optimal care of PWH. There is a need for further appropriately designed studies that address unanswered questions about specific outcomes and the optimal structure of the integrated care delivery model in haemophilia.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 16
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations
    Andrews, Jeff
    Guyatt, Gordon
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Alderson, Phil
    Dahm, Philipp
    Falck-Ytter, Yngve
    Nasser, Mona
    Meerpohl, Joerg
    Post, Piet N.
    Kunz, Regina
    Brozek, Jan
    Vist, Gunn
    Rind, David
    Akl, Elie A.
    Schuenemann, Holger J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (07) : 719 - 725
  • [2] GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength
    Andrews, Jeffrey C.
    Schuenemann, Holger J.
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Pottie, Kevin
    Meerpohl, Joerg J.
    Coello, Pablo Alonso
    Rind, David
    Montori, Victor M.
    Brito, Juan Pablo
    Norris, Susan
    Elbarbary, Mahmoud
    Post, Piet
    Nasser, Mona
    Shukla, Vijay
    Jaeschke, Roman
    Brozek, Jan
    Djulbegovic, Ben
    Guyatt, Gordon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (07) : 726 - 735
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1995, CMAJ, V153, P19
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust
  • [5] [Anonymous], HAEMOPHILIA S4, DOI DOI 10.1111/HAE.12429
  • [6] A Community-Based Partnership to Promote Information Infrastructure for Bleeding Disorders
    Aschman, Diane J.
    Abshire, Thomas C.
    Shapiro, Amy D.
    Lusher, Jeanne M.
    Forsberg, Ann D.
    Kulkarni, Roshni
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 41 (06) : S332 - S337
  • [7] A model for a regional system of care to promote the health and well-being of people with rare chronic genetic disorders
    Baker, JR
    Crudder, SO
    Riske, B
    Bias, V
    Forsberg, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 95 (11) : 1910 - 1916
  • [8] Modern haemophilia care
    Berntorp, Erik
    Shapiro, Amy D.
    [J]. LANCET, 2012, 379 (9824) : 1447 - 1456
  • [9] Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines Part 3 of 3. The GRADE approach to developing recommendations
    Brozek, J. L.
    Akl, E. A.
    Compalati, E.
    Kreis, J.
    Terracciano, L.
    Fiocchi, A.
    Ueffing, E.
    Andrews, J.
    Alonso-Coello, P.
    Meerpohl, J. J.
    Lang, D. M.
    Jaeschke, R.
    Williams, J. W., Jr.
    Phillips, B.
    Lethaby, A.
    Bossuyt, P.
    Glasziou, P.
    Helfand, M.
    Watine, J.
    Afilalo, M.
    Welch, V.
    Montedori, A.
    Abraha, I.
    Horvath, A. R.
    Bousquet, J.
    Guyatt, G. H.
    Schuenemann, H. J.
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2011, 66 (05) : 588 - 595
  • [10] Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies
    Brozek, J. L.
    Akl, E. A.
    Jaeschke, R.
    Lang, D. M.
    Bossuyt, P.
    Glasziou, P.
    Helfand, M.
    Ueffing, E.
    Alonso-Coello, P.
    Meerpohl, J.
    Phillips, B.
    Horvath, A. R.
    Bousquet, J.
    Guyatt, G. H.
    Schuenemann, H. J.
    [J]. ALLERGY, 2009, 64 (08) : 1109 - 1116