Questioning the rhetoric: A critical analysis of intergovernmental organisations' entrepreneurship education policy

被引:2
作者
Amiel, May [1 ]
Yemini, Miri [2 ]
Kolleck, Nina [3 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Educ Policy, Jaime & Joan Constantiner Sch Educ, Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Univ Leipzig, Educ Policy & Citizenship Educ, Leipzig, Germany
来源
EUROPEAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL | 2022年 / 21卷 / 05期
关键词
Entrepreneurship; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; European Union; policy; discourse; ENTERPRISE EDUCATION; SCHOOLS; OECD; PISA; NEOLIBERALISM; COMPETENCE; EU;
D O I
10.1177/14749041211005893
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Entrepreneurship education is increasingly prominent in university and school curricula worldwide, following its intensive advocacy by intergovernmental organisations and national governments as a remedy for the urgent pressures to better prepare students for today's globalised and highly competitive workplace. This study analyses the official policy documents of two of the most influential intergovernmental organisations - the European Union and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development - in a quest to understand how each of these organisations presents and promotes entrepreneurship education. We argue that while the rationales and problems the European Union and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development address regarding entrepreneurship education differ somewhat, the two organisations propose a very similar solution for entrepreneurship education implementation, occasionally even advocated through formal collaboration between the two intergovernmental organisations. We suggest that this collaboration exemplifies how intergovernmental organisations seek to govern in line with a globally dominant logic by providing universal, de-contextualised solutions to various problems. We build on previous studies on other policies these intergovernmental organisations advocated (e.g. quality education and modernisation of higher education) to learn about the nuances of such policy moves. We conclude by suggesting a critical understanding of such policy convergences and outlining recommendations for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:756 / 777
页数:22
相关论文
共 108 条
  • [1] The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory
    Alvarez, SA
    Busenitz, LW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2001, 27 (06) : 755 - 775
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, A New Skills Agenda for Europe
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, READ EDUC
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2012, Rethinking Education: Investing in skills for better socioeconomic outcomes
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2013, Reigniting the entrepreneurial spirit in Europe
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2000, LISBON EUROPEAN COUN
  • [7] Battling Promethean dreams and Trojan horses: Revealing the critical discourses of geoengineering
    Anshelm, Jonas
    Hansson, Anders
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2014, 2 : 135 - 144
  • [8] Science by streetlight and the OECD's measure of global competence: A new yardstick for internationalisation?
    Auld, Euan
    Morris, Paul
    [J]. POLICY FUTURES IN EDUCATION, 2019, 17 (06): : 677 - 698
  • [9] PISA, policy and persuasion: translating complex conditions into education 'best practice'
    Auld, Euan
    Morris, Paul
    [J]. COMPARATIVE EDUCATION, 2016, 52 (02) : 202 - 229
  • [10] Ball S., 2012, Foucault, Power, and Education