Attitudes and experiences of European clinical geneticists towards direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a qualitative interview study

被引:3
作者
Kalokairinou, Louiza [1 ]
Borry, Pascal [1 ]
Howard, Heidi C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leuven, Ctr Biomed Eth & Law, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Uppsala Univ, Ctr Res Eth & Bioeth, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Direct-to-consumer; genetic testing; medical supervision; genetic counseling; PRIMARY-CARE PROVIDERS; PERSONAL UTILITY; PERSPECTIVES; AWARENESS; PROFESSIONALS; TECHNOLOGIES; INFORMATION; PERCEPTIONS; PHYSICIANS; GENOMICS;
D O I
10.1080/14636778.2019.1677149
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic tests (GT) enable consumers to access a wide range of GT, without involving a healthcare professional, promoting an increasing disassociation of genetics from the clinical context. This study explores, through semi-structured interviews, the experiences and attitudes of European clinical geneticists towards DTCGT. Our results indicate that the participants have limited experience of consultations with patients regarding such tests. The majority of participants stated that consumers purchased tests out of curiosity and sought a general interpretation of test results by a healthcare professional. Most respondents were skeptical of the quality of tests, especially regarding their clinical utility. The participants supported the importance of medical supervision and genetic counseling in this context. Finally, most respondents considered it their duty to accept consultations concerning DTCGT results. However, due to concerns over limited time and potential downstream costs, some participants supported that a prioritization system based on guidelines would be necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 429
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An exploration of genetic health professionals' experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in their clinical practice
    Gemma R Brett
    Sylvia A Metcalfe
    David J Amor
    Jane L Halliday
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2012, 20 : 825 - 830
  • [32] Framing genetic risk: trust and credibility markers in online direct-to-consumer advertising for genetic testing
    Einsiedel, Edna F.
    Geransar, Rose
    NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY, 2009, 28 (04) : 339 - 362
  • [33] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: where and how does genetic counseling fit?
    Middleton, Anna
    Mendes, Alvaro
    Benjamin, Caroline M.
    Howard, Heidi Carmen
    PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (03) : 249 - 257
  • [34] Young people's moral attitudes and motivations towards direct-to-consumer genetic testing for inherited risk of Alzheimer disease
    Pavarini, Gabriela
    Hamdi, Lamis
    Lorimer, Jessica
    Singh, Ilina
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2021, 64 (06)
  • [35] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies tell their customers to 'see a genetic counselor'. How do genetic counselors feel about direct-to-consumer genetic testing?
    Hsieh, Vicky
    Braid, Tamara
    Gordon, Erynn
    Hercher, Laura
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2021, 30 (01) : 191 - 197
  • [36] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: good, bad or benign?
    Caulfield, T.
    Ries, N. M.
    Ray, P. N.
    Shuman, C.
    Wilson, B.
    CLINICAL GENETICS, 2010, 77 (02) : 101 - 105
  • [37] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: regulating offer or use?
    Rial-Sebbag, Emmanuelle
    Borry, Pascal
    PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (03) : 315 - 317
  • [38] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing for breast cancer risk
    Reed, E. Kate
    Edelman, Emily A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2018, 30 (10) : 548 - 550
  • [39] Adoptees’ views and experiences of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomic testing: an exploratory interview study from the UK
    Alison C. Kay
    Nicola V. Taverner
    Journal of Community Genetics, 2023, 14 : 149 - 162
  • [40] Perceptions of genetic counseling services in direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing
    Darst, B. F.
    Madlensky, L.
    Schork, N. J.
    Topol, E. J.
    Bloss, C. S.
    CLINICAL GENETICS, 2013, 84 (04) : 335 - 339