An Analysis of Countries' Bargaining Power Derived from the Natural Gas Transportation System Using a Cooperative Game Theory Model

被引:3
作者
Roman, Mihai Daniel [1 ]
Stanculescu, Diana Mihaela [2 ]
机构
[1] Bucharest Univ Econ Studies, Fac Cybernet Stat & Econ Informat, Bucharest 010374, Romania
[2] Bucharest Univ Econ Studies, Econ Cybernet & Stat Doctoral Sch, Bucharest 010374, Romania
关键词
natural gas market; game theory; cooperative games; Shapley value; bargaining power; Nord Stream 2 pipeline;
D O I
10.3390/en14123595
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
A large consumption of natural gas accompanied by reduced production capabilities makes Europe heavily dependent on imports from Russia. More than half of Russian gas is exported by transiting Ukraine, so in the context of the underlying conflict between the two, this is considered uncertain. Therefore, in this article, we modeled the natural gas transportation system using cooperative game theory in order to determine the bargaining power of the major players (Russia, Ukraine, Germany, and Norway) by using a form of the Shapley value. We described the interaction between countries as network games where utilities from transport routes are considered and proposed three scenarios where the gas flow from Russia to Ukraine is either diminished or completely interrupted, with the purpose of finding out how the bargaining power on this market is shifted in case of network redesign. In this context, we included in the analysis the scenario where the Nord Stream 2 pipeline will be finished. Results showed that Russia dominates the market in any scenario, and by avoiding Ukraine, its position is even further strengthened. Moreover, Germany's position remains stable considering its diverse imports and large storage capabilities, and its bargaining power increases in the case of diminishing or avoiding the Ukrainian gas pipelines.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, RUSSIAN GAS PIPELINE
[2]   The Shapley value for bicooperative games [J].
Bilbao, J. M. ;
Fernandez, J. R. ;
Jimenez, N. ;
Lopez, J. J. .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2008, 158 (01) :99-115
[3]   Decision-making in the oil and gas projects based on game theory: Conceptual process design [J].
Castillo, L. ;
Dorao, C. A. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 66 :48-55
[4]   Central Asian gas in Eurasian power game [J].
Cobanli, Onur .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 68 :348-370
[5]   INVESTMENT OPTIONS AND BARGAINING POWER: THE EURASIAN SUPPLY CHAIN FOR NATURAL GAS [J].
Hubert, Franz ;
Ikonnikova, Svetlana .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 59 (01) :85-116
[6]  
IEA, 2018, DATA AND STATISTICSD
[7]   Allocation rules for network games [J].
Jackson, MO .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2005, 51 (01) :128-154
[8]  
Khmelnitskaya A., 2014, 2014064 TILBURG U NE
[9]   The Impact of the Ukraine Crisis on the Planning of Russian-European Natural Gas Pipeline Projects [J].
Ma, Zhihui ;
Pei, Xinlei ;
Yi, Yunfeng ;
Liu, Yi ;
Zhang, Xiaotao .
JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2019, :392-401
[10]  
Markus J.A., 2011, 30031 MPRA U LIB MUN