Frozen Section Examination May Facilitate Reconstructive Surgery for Mid and Low Rectal Cancer

被引:13
作者
Khoury, Wisam [1 ,2 ]
Abboud, Wisam [1 ,2 ]
Hershkovitz, Dov [2 ,3 ]
Duek, Simon D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Dept Gen Surg, Colorectal Surg Unit, Haifa, Israel
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Bruce Rappaport Sch Med, Haifa, Israel
[3] Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Dept Human Pathol, Haifa, Israel
关键词
frozen section; rectal cancer; distal margin; restorative proctectomy; abdominoperineal resection; CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN INVOLVEMENT; SPHINCTER-PRESERVING SURGERY; MESORECTAL EXCISION; DISTAL MARGIN; INTERSPHINCTERIC RESECTION; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; SAVING RESECTION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CM; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1002/jso.23758
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundDistal margin >1cm provides an oncologic safety in low-lying rectal cancers. We evaluated the accuracy of frozen section (FS) examination in estimating distal margins, and its impact on intraoperative decision making regarding restorative proctectomy. MethodsRetrospective study of patients who underwent surgery for adenocarcinoma of the mid or lower rectum during 2001-2010 and for whom a distal margin specimen was examined intraoperatively by FS, to confirm microscopically free margins. Intraoperative findings, and frozen and final paraffin section findings were retrieved from patient charts. A distal margin of 1cm was compared with >1cm, for free margins at final pathology and local recurrence (LR). The impact of a distal margin 5mm was also assessed. The impact of FS on intraoperative decision making, in patients who did and did not receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy, was assessed. ResultsThe mean age of the 63 patients studied was 66.411.8 years, and median tumor distance from the anal verge 6cm (range 1-10cm). Seven patients underwent abdominoperineal resection, 54 anterior resection, and two Hartman procedures. FS sensitivity and specificity were 83% and 98%, respectively. Accuracy of FS was high for the 41 patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy, and the 22 who were not. Distal margin >5mm at FS examination ensured a free margin at final pathology. LR rate was comparable between patients with distal margin >10mm and 10mm, 8% vs 11%, P=0.65. ConclusionsFS examination may help determine free distal margin and consequently, in selected cases, may facilitate a restorative procedure in patients with low rectal cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 2014; 110:997-1001. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:997 / 1001
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   ROLE OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN INVOLVEMENT IN THE LOCAL RECURRENCE OF RECTAL-CANCER [J].
ADAM, IJ ;
MOHAMDEE, MO ;
MARTIN, IG ;
SCOTT, N ;
FINAN, PJ ;
JOHNSTON, D ;
DIXON, MF ;
QUIRKE, P .
LANCET, 1994, 344 (8924) :707-711
[2]   Is the 1-cm Rule of Distal Bowel Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Based on Clinical Evidence? A Systematic Review [J].
Bujko, Krzysztof ;
Rutkowski, Andrzej ;
Chang, George J. ;
Michalski, Wojciech ;
Chmielik, Ewa ;
Kusnierz, Jerzy .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (03) :801-808
[3]   Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer [J].
Chamlou, Reza ;
Parc, Yann ;
Simon, Tabassome ;
Bennis, Malika ;
Dehni, Nidal ;
Parc, Rolland ;
Tiret, Emmanuel .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 246 (06) :916-922
[4]   Pushing the Envelope Beyond a Centimeter in Rectal Cancer: Oncologic Implications of Close, But Negative Margins [J].
Fitzgerald, Timothy L. ;
Brinkley, Jason ;
Zervos, Emmanuel E. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2011, 213 (05) :589-595
[5]   Circumferential margin involvement after mesorectal excision of rectal cancer with curative intent - Predictor of survival but not local recurrence? [J].
Hall, NR ;
Finan, PJ ;
Al-Jaberi, T ;
Tsang, CS ;
Brown, SR ;
Dixon, MF ;
Quirke, P .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1998, 41 (08) :979-983
[6]   Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer [J].
Kapiteijn, E ;
Marijnen, CAM ;
Nagtegaal, ID ;
Putter, H ;
Steup, WH ;
Wiggers, T ;
Rutten, HJT ;
Pahlman, L ;
Glimelius, B ;
van Krieken, JHJM ;
Leer, JWH ;
van de Velde, CJH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (09) :638-646
[7]   Does a Subcentimeter Distal Resection Margin Adversely Influence Oncologic Outcomes in Patients With Rectal Cancer Undergoing Restorative Proctectomy? [J].
Kiran, Ravi P. ;
Lian, Lei ;
Lavery, Ian C. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (02) :157-163
[8]   Distal margin requirements after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for distal rectal carcinomas:: Are ≤ 1 cm distal margins sufficient? [J].
Kuvshinoff, B ;
Maghfoor, I ;
Miedema, B ;
Bryer, M ;
Westgate, S ;
Wilkes, J ;
Ota, D .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 8 (02) :163-169
[9]   Oncologically Safe Distal Resection Margins in Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Chemoradiotherapy [J].
Kwak, Jae Young ;
Kim, Chan Wook ;
Lim, Seok-Byung ;
Yu, Chang Sik ;
Kim, Tae Won ;
Kim, Jong Hoon ;
Jang, Se Jin ;
Kim, Jin Cheon .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2012, 16 (10) :1947-1954
[10]   Practice Parameters for the Management of Rectal Cancer (Revised) [J].
Monson, J. R. T. ;
Weiser, M. R. ;
Buie, W. D. ;
Chang, G. J. ;
Rafferty, J. F. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2013, 56 (05) :535-550