Controversies and uncertainties: Abdominal versus vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse

被引:11
作者
Brubaker, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Univ, Ctr Med, Dept Obstet, Div Female Pelv Med & Reconstruct Surg, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
[2] Loyola Univ, Ctr Med, Dept Gynecol, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
[3] Loyola Univ, Ctr Med, Dept Urol, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
关键词
prolapse surgery; vaginal prolapse; reconstructive surgery;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.633
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Reconstructive pelvic surgery is a common phenomenon in American women. The efficacy and durability Of Current procedures are often extrapolated from clinical case series and may be fraught with bias. Although the route of reconstructive pelvic Surgery is debated with little evidence to support expert opinion, several recent clinical trials have provided a modest amount of data that can assist Surgeons in counseling women who are facing prolapse repairs. An individual woman's tolerance for certain symptoms and risks can be matched with the scientifically based evidence for certain procedures. It is clear that the route Of surgery must vary with individual surgeons and individual patients. The challenge is to test Current surgical habits using modern clinical trials to obtain the necessary information to optimize each and every woman's restorative surgery. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:690 / 693
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: A prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation [J].
Benson, JT ;
Lucente, V ;
McClellan, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (06) :1418-1421
[2]   Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979-1997 [J].
Boyles, SH ;
Weber, AM ;
Meyn, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (01) :108-115
[3]   Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States, 1997 [J].
Brown, JS ;
Waetjen, LE ;
Subak, LL ;
Thom, DH ;
Van Den Eeden, S ;
Vittinghoff, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (04) :712-716
[4]   A randomized trial of colpopexy and urinary reduction efforts (CARE): design and methods [J].
Brubaker, L ;
Cundiff, G ;
Fine, P ;
Nygaard, I ;
Richter, H ;
Visco, A ;
Zyczynski, H ;
Brown, MB ;
Weber, A .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2003, 24 (05) :629-642
[5]   Patient-selected goals: A new perspective on surgical outcome [J].
Elkadry, EA ;
Kenton, KS ;
FitzGerald, MP ;
Shott, S ;
Brubaker, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (06) :1551-1557
[6]   Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: A prospective randomized study [J].
Maher, CF ;
Qatawneh, AM ;
Dwyer, PL ;
Carey, MP ;
Cornish, A ;
Schluter, PJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 190 (01) :20-26
[7]   Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence [J].
Olsen, AL ;
Smith, VJ ;
Bergstrom, JO ;
Colling, JC ;
Clark, AL .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (04) :501-506
[8]   A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments [J].
Shull, BL ;
Bachofen, C ;
Coates, KW ;
Kuehl, TJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 183 (06) :1365-1373
[9]   Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States [J].
Subak, LL ;
Waetjen, LE ;
van den Eeden, S ;
Thom, DH ;
Vittinghoff, E ;
Brown, JS .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 98 (04) :646-651
[10]   Risk factors for prolapse recurrence after vaginal repair [J].
Whiteside, JL ;
Weber, AM ;
Meyn, LA ;
Walters, MD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (05) :1533-1538