Library Instruction and Themed Composition Courses: An Investigation of Factors that Impact Student Learning

被引:14
作者
Rinto, Erin E. [1 ]
Cogbill-Seiders, Elisa I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
关键词
Information literacy instruction; Value of libraries; English composition; First-year college students; INFORMATION LITERACY; RUBRICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.acalib.2014.11.010
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Many academic libraries partner with English composition in order to teach first year students skills related to academic research and writing. Due to the partnership between information literacy and first-year writing programs, it is important to evaluate how these programs can best support one another. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of two factors on student information literacy skill development: library instruction and section theme-defined here as class sections of the English 102 (ENG 102) program developed around a central topic selected by the instructor. A random sample of annotated bibliographies from 95 sections of ENG 102 were scored with two information literacy rubrics in order to find out if scores differed between sections based on the variables of library instruction and theme. The results of this study indicate that sections of the ENG 102 program that attended an information literacy instruction session scored significantly higher on the annotated bibliography assignment than sections that did not attend. We also found that themed sections of ENG 102 scored marginally higher on the annotated bibliography than non-themed sections of ENG 102. Implications for further research are discussed, including the potential impact of theme-based writing on information literacy learning. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 20
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Adler-Kassner Linda., 2012, WPA WRITING PROGRAM, V36, P119
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability. The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Raters
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Assessing performance
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT
[5]  
Arter J., 2001, Scoring Rubrics in the Classroom
[6]  
Bawarshi AS, 2003, GENRE AND THE INVENTION OF THE WRITER: RECONSIDERING THE PLACE OF INVENTION IN COMPOSITION, P1
[7]  
Beaufort A., 2012, Composition Forum, V26
[8]  
Booth C., 2014, DEGREES IMP IN PRESS
[9]   Library Instruction and Academic Success: A Mixed-Methods Assessment of a Library Instruction Program [J].
Bowles-Terry, Melissa .
EVIDENCE BASED LIBRARY AND INFORMATION PRACTICE, 2012, 7 (01) :82-95
[10]   INTEGRATION AND GENERALIZATION OF KAPPAS FOR MULTIPLE RATERS [J].
CONGER, AJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1980, 88 (02) :322-328