The Environmental Assessment on Chinese Logistics Enterprises Based on Non-Radial DEA

被引:10
|
作者
Liu, Jie [1 ]
Yuan, Chunhui [1 ]
Li, Xiaolong [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100876, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Sch Modern Post, Beijing 100876, Peoples R China
关键词
sustainability; green logistics; Chinese logistics; DEA; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION; UNIFIED EFFICIENCY; ECO-EFFICIENCY; POWER-PLANTS; SUSTAINABILITY; INDUSTRY; ENERGY; MODEL; CO2;
D O I
10.3390/en12244760
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Under the new situation of economic development in China, the logistics industry is facing unbalanced development regarding economic and environmental performance. From the enterprise level, this study investigated the sustainability of Chinese logistics based on the environmental assessment data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, and measured the unified efficiency of a logistics company under two different production arrangement strategies. The empirical measurement provides several findings. First, logistics enterprises give higher priority to operational benefits than environmental performance. Second, under the operational priority of production arrangement, small and medium-sized enterprises' (SMEs) unified efficiency is better than a large enterprise, and private enterprises' unified efficiency is better than state-owned enterprises. Moreover, the empirical study has further proved that the sustainability development of Chinese logistics is still at the primary stage; when facing trade-offs in the sustainability context, logistics companies still prioritize operational performance first. Therefore, transforming corporate strategy into an environmental sustainable priority and realizing logistics sustainability still has a long way to go, which is the backbone of realizing balanced development of both the economy and environment.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A non-radial approach to improve the interval cost efficiency score in DEA
    Tohidi G.
    Tohidnia S.
    International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2021, 39 (02) : 151 - 161
  • [22] Ranking all units with non-radial models in DEA
    Jabbari, A.
    Hosseinzadehlotfi, F.
    Jahanshahloo, Gh
    Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NONLINEAR ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, 10 (02): : 111 - 129
  • [23] A Non-radial DEA Index for Peruvian Regional Competitiveness
    Vincent Charles
    Guillermo Díaz
    Social Indicators Research, 2017, 134 : 747 - 770
  • [24] A Non-radial DEA Index for Peruvian Regional Competitiveness
    Charles, Vincent
    Diaz, Guillermo
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2017, 134 (02) : 747 - 770
  • [25] Two-stage innovation efficiency of new energy enterprises in China: A non-radial DEA approach
    Wang, Qunwei
    Hang, Ye
    Sun, Licheng
    Zhao, Zengyao
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2016, 112 : 254 - 261
  • [26] DEA-based Performance Measurement of Seaports in Northeast Asia: Radial and Non-radial Approach
    Jiang, Bao
    Li, Jian
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND LOGISTICS, 2009, 25 (02) : 219 - 236
  • [27] Two non-radial measures of super-efficiency in DEA with data uncertainty
    Xu, Xiaoning
    Chen, Rong
    He, Feng
    Zhu, Liyun
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 32 (06) : 4533 - 4542
  • [28] Measurement of returns to scale using non-radial DEA models
    Krivonozhko, Vladimir E.
    Forsund, Finn R.
    Lychev, Andrey V.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 232 (03) : 664 - 670
  • [29] Evaluation of Energy-Environment Efficiency of European Transport Sectors: Non-Radial DEA and TOPSIS Approach
    Djordjevic, Boban
    Krmac, Evelin
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (15)
  • [30] A non-radial measure of different systems for Taiwanese tourist hotels' efficiency assessment
    Chiu, Yung-ho
    Huang, Chin-wei
    Ting, Chung-te
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2012, 20 (01) : 45 - 63