Evaluation of the acute cervical spine: A management algorithm

被引:27
作者
Banit, DM
Grau, G
Fisher, JR
机构
[1] Christiana Spine Ctr, Christiana Care Hlth Serv, Newark, DE 19713 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed Surg, Lexington, KY USA
来源
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE | 2000年 / 49卷 / 03期
关键词
cervical spine clearance; cervical spine injury; cervical spine protocol;
D O I
10.1097/00005373-200009000-00011
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Safe, efficient, and cost-effective evaluation of the spine is the goal in the trauma setting. At our Level I trauma facility, the trauma service, emergency medicine, radiology, anesthesia, and the spine service combined individual concerns into one agreed-upon clearance protocol. Here, we present the effectiveness of a new cervical spine clearance protocol. Methods: A retrospective review was initiated of all trauma patients evaluated in a Level I trauma center the year before and after implementation of a new cervical spine protocol to determine the incidence of missed cervical injuries. An additional 6 months were reviewed to detect any missed injuries late in the study period. Results: During the 2-year study period, 4,460 patients presented to the emergency room with some form of cervical spine precautions. Blunt trauma comprised 90% of the study population, According to the protocol, approximately 45% required further cervical radiographs after presentation. In the preprotocol year, 77 of 2,217 (3.4%) patients were diagnosed with cervical spine injuries, 16 of 77 (21%) with multiple level of injuries, and 25 of 77 (32%) with neurologic compromise. Three of 2,217 patients had missed cervical spine injuries on their initial evaluations. In the postprotocol year, 84 of 2,243 (3.4%) patients had cervical injuries, 25 of 84 (30%) with multiple levels of injuries and 28 of 84 (28%) with neurologic compromise. No patient evaluated during the protocol year was missed. All statistics between the two groups were not significant. Conclusion: The current protocol by risk stratifying patients on presentation is effective In assessing patients for cervical spine injuries.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 456
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   CLINICAL INDICATIONS FOR CERVICAL-SPINE RADIOGRAPHS IN THE TRAUMATIZED PATIENT [J].
BACHULIS, BL ;
LONG, WB ;
HYNES, GD ;
JOHNSON, MC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1987, 153 (05) :473-477
[2]  
BENSON DR, 1987, EMERGENCY MED COMPRE, P143
[3]  
BINET E F, 1977, Spine, V2, P163, DOI 10.1097/00007632-197709000-00001
[5]   CT IN THE EVALUATION OF SPINE TRAUMA [J].
BRANTZAWADZKI, M ;
MILLER, EM ;
FEDERLE, MP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1981, 136 (02) :369-375
[6]   OCCULT CERVICAL-SPINE FRACTURE IN AN AMBULATORY PATIENT [J].
BRESLER, MJ ;
RICH, GH .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1982, 11 (08) :440-442
[7]   HIGH-YIELD RADIOGRAPHIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR CERVICAL-SPINE INJURIES [J].
CADOUX, CG ;
WHITE, JD .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1986, 15 (03) :236-239
[8]  
*COMM TRAUM AM COL, 1989, ADV TRAUM LIF SUPP, P166
[9]   PAIN AND TISSUE-INTERFACE PRESSURES DURING SPINE-BOARD IMMOBILIZATION [J].
CORDELL, WH ;
HOLLINGSWORTH, JC ;
OLINGER, ML ;
STROMAN, SJ ;
NELSON, DR .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1995, 26 (01) :31-36
[10]  
Daffner Richard H., 1993, Journal of Emergency Medicine, V11, P619, DOI 10.1016/0736-4679(93)90318-2