Dynamic assessment modelling for project portfolio benefits

被引:30
作者
Bai, Libiao [1 ]
Sun, Yichen [1 ]
Shi, Huijing [1 ]
Shi, Chunming [2 ]
Bai, Jieyu [1 ]
Han, Xiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Changan Univ, Xian 710064, Peoples R China
[2] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, Waterloo, ON, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Project portfolio benefits; benefit assessment; system dynamics; synergetic effect; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEM; SELECTION; COST; IMPACT; SUCCESS; PROFITABILITY; STAKEHOLDERS; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.1080/01605682.2021.1915193
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Project portfolio benefits (PPBs) are typically regarded as a key feature for successful project portfolios in practice. However, there is little prescriptive knowledge that offers guidance on how to tackle the realisation and improvement of PPBs. To narrow this research gap, we develop a systematic assessment model to analyse and optimize PPBs. Innovatively considering the recessive benefits resulting from synergies among different project components, four subsystems of PPBs are identified. Subsequently, by synthesizing the interrelations within and between subsystems, a system dynamics model is developed to assess PPBs dynamically. Then, a numerical example is adopted to validate the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed model. It can be concluded that the model is exploitable in academia and practice. For academia, this study expands benefit management tools and provides a theoretical basis for project portfolio benefit optimization. For practitioners, the straightforward model and procedure contribute to enhancing the management of PPBs.
引用
收藏
页码:1596 / 1619
页数:24
相关论文
共 91 条
[11]   Dynamic sustainability requirements of stakeholders and the supply portfolio [J].
Chowdhury, Md Maruf Hossan ;
Paul, Sanjoy Kumar ;
Sianaki, Omid Ameri ;
Quaddus, Mohammed A. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 255
[12]  
Cooper R.G., 2002, PDMA toolbook for new product success, V1rst, P331
[13]   A system dynamics model for optimal allocation of natural gas to various demand sectors [J].
Daneshzand, Farzaneh ;
Amin-Naseri, Mohammad Reza ;
Asali, Mehdi ;
Elkamel, Ali ;
Fowler, Michael .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 128 :88-105
[14]   Complexity, uncertainty and mental models: From a paradigm of regulation to a paradigm of emergence in project management [J].
Daniel, Pierre A. ;
Daniel, Carole .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2018, 36 (01) :184-197
[15]   Project portfolio selection and scheduling optimization based on risk measure: a conditional value at risk approach [J].
Dixit, Vijaya ;
Tiwari, Manoj Kumar .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2020, 285 (1-2) :9-33
[16]   Increasing project benefits by project opportunity exploitation [J].
Eskerod, Pernille ;
Ang, Karyne ;
Andersen, Erling S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2018, 11 (01) :35-52
[17]   Knowledge sharing in smart grid pilot projects [J].
Evers, Gerwin ;
Chappin, Maryse M. H. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 143
[18]  
FORRESTER JW, 1958, HARVARD BUS REV, V36, P37
[19]   Planning for shortages? Net Present Value analysis for a deteriorating item with partial backlogging [J].
Ghiami, Yousef ;
Beullens, Patrick .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2016, 178 :1-11
[20]   Cost-benefit analysis of a circular economy project: a study on a recycling system for end-of-life tyres [J].
Gigli, Silvia ;
Landi, Daniele ;
Germani, Michele .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 229 :680-694