Dynamic assessment modelling for project portfolio benefits

被引:30
作者
Bai, Libiao [1 ]
Sun, Yichen [1 ]
Shi, Huijing [1 ]
Shi, Chunming [2 ]
Bai, Jieyu [1 ]
Han, Xiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Changan Univ, Xian 710064, Peoples R China
[2] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, Waterloo, ON, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Project portfolio benefits; benefit assessment; system dynamics; synergetic effect; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEM; SELECTION; COST; IMPACT; SUCCESS; PROFITABILITY; STAKEHOLDERS; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.1080/01605682.2021.1915193
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Project portfolio benefits (PPBs) are typically regarded as a key feature for successful project portfolios in practice. However, there is little prescriptive knowledge that offers guidance on how to tackle the realisation and improvement of PPBs. To narrow this research gap, we develop a systematic assessment model to analyse and optimize PPBs. Innovatively considering the recessive benefits resulting from synergies among different project components, four subsystems of PPBs are identified. Subsequently, by synthesizing the interrelations within and between subsystems, a system dynamics model is developed to assess PPBs dynamically. Then, a numerical example is adopted to validate the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed model. It can be concluded that the model is exploitable in academia and practice. For academia, this study expands benefit management tools and provides a theoretical basis for project portfolio benefit optimization. For practitioners, the straightforward model and procedure contribute to enhancing the management of PPBs.
引用
收藏
页码:1596 / 1619
页数:24
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]   Project stakeholder analysis as an environmental interpretation process [J].
Aaltonen, Kirsi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2011, 29 (02) :165-183
[2]   A project lifecycle perspective on stakeholder influence strategies in global projects [J].
Aaltonen, Kirsi ;
Kujala, Jaakko .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2010, 26 (04) :381-397
[3]   Project portfolio selection based on synergy degree of composite system [J].
Bai, LiBiao ;
Chen, Hongliang ;
Gao, Qi ;
Luo, Wei .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2018, 22 (16) :5535-5545
[4]  
Barlas Y, 1996, SYST DYNAM REV, V12, P183, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199623)12:3<183::AID-SDR103>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-4
[6]   Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices [J].
Barzilai, J .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1997, 48 (12) :1226-1232
[7]   Behavior of internal stakeholders in project portfolio management and its impact on success [J].
Beringer, Claus ;
Jonas, Daniel ;
Kock, Alexander .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2013, 31 (06) :830-846
[8]   Office building deep energy retrofit: life cycle cost benefit analyses using cash flow analysis and multiple benefits on project level [J].
Bleyl, Jan W. ;
Bareit, Markus ;
Casas, Miguel A. ;
Chatterjee, Souran ;
Coolen, Johan ;
Hulshoff, Albert ;
Lohse, Ruediger ;
Mitchell, Sarah ;
Robertson, Mark ;
Urge-Vorsatz, Diana .
ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2019, 12 (01) :261-279
[9]   Enhancing value capture by managing risks of value slippage in and across projects [J].
Bos-de Vos, Marina ;
Volker, Leentje ;
Wamelink, Hans .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2019, 37 (05) :767-783
[10]   Benefits management: Lost or found in translation [J].
Breese, Richard ;
Jenner, Stephen ;
Serra, Carlos Eduardo Martins ;
Thorp, John .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2015, 33 (07) :1438-1451