ERG overexpression and multifocality predict prostate cancer in subsequent biopsy for patients with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

被引:9
|
作者
Shah, Rajal B. [1 ]
Li, Jianbo [2 ]
Dhanani, Nadeem [3 ]
Mendrinos, Savvas [1 ]
机构
[1] Miraca Life Sci, Miraca Life Sci Res Inst, Div Urol Pathol, Irving, TX USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Univ Texas Houston, Div Urol, Houston, TX USA
关键词
High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN); ERG; Multifocality; Prostate cancer; ATYPICAL CRIBRIFORM LESIONS; ANTIGEN LEVELS; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS; MEN; RISK; EXPRESSION; CARCINOMA; COMPLICATIONS; HGPIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.10.008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The most important clinical significance of an isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) diagnosis is the risk of missed prostate cancer (PCa) in subsequent biopsies. Because most patients with HGPIN do not harbor or develop PCa, clinical, pathological, or molecular markers that predict of PCa risk are of clinical significance. Materials and methods: Overall, 155 men with a diagnosis of isolated HGPIN, which was based on the results of extended biopsy, and who underwent at least one repeat biopsy were analyzed for ERG oncoprotein (ERG) expression and clinicopathological parameters to determine the risk of finding PCa in subsequent biopsies. Results: Of 155 patients diagnosed with HGPIN on initial biopsy, 39 (25%) had PCa on subsequent biopsies. For men with only one repeat biopsy, the cancer detection rate was 22%. Most (54%) PCas were detected in <= 6 months of rebiopsy. ERG expression was present in 15 patients with HGPIN (9.6%). Patients with ERG expression in HGPIN were more likely to have PCa in repeat biopsy, with 9 (60%) ERG-positive and 30 (21%) of ERG-negative patients having PCa (P = 0.001). Multifocal involvement (P = 0.0001), cribriform morphology (P = 0.004), and bilaterality (P = 0.0075) of HGPIN were other significant risk factors. On multivariable analysis, only the presence of ERG positivity and multifocality remained significant parameters in detecting PCa on a repeat biopsy. The presence of ERG negative focal HGPIN involving one core, which accounted for 46% of patients, had minimal (16%) PCa risk on subsequent biopsy. In total, 8 patients (89%) ERG-positive HGPIN had PCa identified at identical sites on subsequent biopsy, of which 5 (71%) were ERG positive. Conclusions: The status of ERG expression in HGPIN along with other histological parameters stratifies patients into low- and high-risk groups for having PCa on subsequent biopsy. Our results further support molecular characterization of HGPIN as a means to improve risk stratification and optimize surveillance strategies. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:120.e1 / 120.e7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, PIN-like carcinoma, ductal carcinoma, and intraductal carcinoma of the prostate
    Zhou, Ming
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2018, 31 : S71 - S79
  • [42] Microvessel density as a molecular marker for identifying high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia precursors to prostate cancer
    Sinha, AA
    Quast, BJ
    Reddy, PK
    Lall, V
    Wilson, MJ
    Qian, J
    Bostwick, DG
    EXPERIMENTAL AND MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, 2004, 77 (02) : 153 - 159
  • [43] Glyoxalase 1 Expression as a Novel Diagnostic Marker of High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Prostate Cancer
    Rounds, Liliana
    Nagle, Ray B.
    Muranyi, Andrea
    Jandova, Jana
    Gill, Scott
    Vela, Elizabeth
    Wondrak, Georg T.
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [44] Association of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia immunohistochemical profile with acinar adenocarcinoma of the prostate
    Dantes-Duran, Mayra A.
    Castelan-Maldonado, Edmundo E.
    del C. Palacios-Saucedo, Gerardo
    GACETA MEDICA DE MEXICO, 2023, 159 (02): : 93 - 97
  • [45] Multiparametric MR can identify high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) lesions and predict future detection of prostate cancer in men with a negative initial prostate biopsy
    Dwivedi, Durgesh Kumar
    Kumar, Rajeev
    Bora, Girdhar Singh
    Sharma, Sanjay
    Thulkar, Sanjay
    Gupta, Siddhartha Datta
    Jagannathan, Naranamangalam R.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 34 (08) : 1081 - 1086
  • [46] MicroRNA Alteration and Putative Target Genes in High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Prostate Cancer: STAT3 and ZEB1 Are Upregulated During Prostate Carcinogenesis
    Cha, Yoon Jin
    Lee, Joo Hyun
    Han, Hyun Ho
    Kim, Baek Gil
    Kang, Suki
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Cho, Nam Hoon
    PROSTATE, 2016, 76 (10) : 937 - 947
  • [47] Can molecular markers stratify the diagnostic value of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia?
    Hailemariam, Seife
    Vosbeck, Juerg
    Cathomas, Gieri
    Zlobec, Inti
    Mattarelli, Gianfranco
    Eichenberger, Tobias
    Zellweger, Tobias
    Bachmann, Alex
    Gasser, Thomas C.
    Bubendorf, Lukas
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2011, 42 (05) : 702 - 709
  • [48] Implications of a diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) on prostate biopsy: a 5-year follow-up study
    O'Connor, Eoghan
    Dowling, Catherine
    Casey, Mary
    O'Connor, Diarmuid
    McHale, Teresa
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 191 (05) : 2035 - 2040
  • [49] The associations between statin use and prostate cancer screening, prostate size, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and prostate cancer
    Jay H. Fowke
    Saundra S. Motley
    Daniel A. Barocas
    Michael S. Cookson
    Raoul Concepcion
    Susan Byerly
    Joseph A. Smith
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2011, 22 : 417 - 426
  • [50] Widespread high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostatic needle biopsy: A significant likelihood of subsequently diagnosed adenocarcinoma
    Netto, George J.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2006, 30 (09) : 1184 - 1188