Assessment of automatic exposure control performance in digital mammography using a no-reference anisotropic quality index

被引:4
作者
Barufaldi, Bruno [1 ,2 ]
Borges, Lucas R. [1 ,2 ]
Bakic, Predrag R. [2 ]
Vieira, Marcelo A. C. [1 ]
Schiabel, Homero [1 ]
Maidment, Andrew D. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2017: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT | 2017年 / 10136卷
关键词
no-reference image quality assessment; anisotropy; digital mammography; automatic exposure control; SYSTEMS; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1117/12.2255629
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Automatic exposure control (AEC) is used in mammography to obtain acceptable radiation dose and adequate image quality regardless of breast thickness and composition. Although there are physics methods for assessing the AEC, it is not clear whether mammography systems operate with optimal dose and image quality in clinical practice. In this work, we propose the use of a normalized anisotropic quality index (NAQI), validated in previous studies, to evaluate the quality of mammograms acquired using AEC. The authors used a clinical dataset that consists of 561 patients and 1,046 mammograms (craniocaudal breast views). The results show that image quality is often maintained, even at various radiation levels (mean NAQI = 0.14 +/- 0.02). However, a more careful analysis of NAQI reveals that the average image quality decreases as breast thickness increases. The NAQI is reduced by 32% on average, when the breast thickness increases from 31 to 71 mm. NAQI also decreases with lower breast density. The variation in breast parenchyma alone cannot fully account for the decrease of NAQI with thickness. Examination of images shows that images of large, fatty breasts are often inadequately processed. This work shows that NAQI can be applied in clinical mammograms to assess mammographic image quality, and highlights the limitations of the automatic exposure control for some images.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Digital Mammographic Artifacts on Full-Field Systems: What Are They and How Do I Fix Them?
    Ayyala, Rama S.
    Chorlton, MaryAnn
    Behrman, Richard H.
    Kornguth, Phyllis J.
    Slanetz, Priscilla J.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2008, 28 (07) : 1999 - 2008
  • [2] The Effect of Breast Composition on a No-reference Anisotropic Quality Index for Digital Mammography
    Barufaldi, Bruno
    Borges, Lucas R.
    Vieira, Marcelo A. C.
    Gabarda, Salvador
    Maidment, Andrew D. A.
    Bakic, Predrag R.
    Pokrajac, David D.
    Schiabel, Homero
    [J]. BREAST IMAGING, IWDM 2016, 2016, 9699 : 226 - 233
  • [3] SIMULATING LOCAL DENSE AREAS USING PMMA TO ASSESS AUTOMATIC EXPOSURE CONTROL IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY
    Bouwman, R. W.
    Binst, J.
    Dance, D. R.
    Young, K. C.
    Broeders, M. J. M.
    den Heeten, G. J.
    Veldkamp, W. J. H.
    Bosmans, H.
    van Engen, R. E.
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2016, 169 (1-4) : 143 - 150
  • [4] Performance evaluation of contrast-detail in full field digital mammography systems using ideal (Hotelling) observer vs. conventional automated analysis of CDMAM images for quality control of contrast-detail characteristics
    Delakis, Ioannis
    Wise, Robert
    Morris, Lauren
    Kulama, Eugenia
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 31 (07): : 741 - 746
  • [5] Blind image quality assessment through anisotropy
    Gabarda, Salvador
    Cristobal, Gabriel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2007, 24 (12) : B42 - B51
  • [6] Kaczmarek R., 2012, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V8313, P1
  • [7] Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation
    Keller, Brad M.
    Nathan, Diane L.
    Wang, Yan
    Zheng, Yuanjie
    Gee, James C.
    Conant, Emily F.
    Kontos, Despina
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (08) : 4903 - 4917
  • [8] Oliveira H. C. R., 2016, SPIE MED IMAGING, DOI DOI 10.1117/12.2217229
  • [9] Tailoring automatic exposure control toward constant detectability in digital mammography
    Salvagnini, Elena
    Bosmans, Hilde
    Struelens, Lara
    Marshall, Nicholas W.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (07) : 3834 - 3847
  • [10] Detectors for digital mammography
    Yaffe, MJ
    Mainprize, JG
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2004, 3 (04) : 309 - 324