You see but you do not observe: A review of bystander intervention and sexual assault on university campuses

被引:82
作者
Labhardt, Danielle [1 ]
Holdsworth, Emma [1 ]
Brown, Sarah [1 ]
Howat, Douglas [1 ]
机构
[1] Coventry Univ, Priory St, Coventry CV1 5FB, W Midlands, England
关键词
Bystander behavior; Bystander intervention; Sexual assault; University campus; Systematic review; RAPE-MYTH-ACCEPTANCE; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; GROUP MEMBERSHIP; PREVENTION; PORNOGRAPHY; ATTITUDES; BEHAVIOR; GENDER; IMPACT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.avb.2017.05.005
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Sexual assault on university campuses has garnered increased attention in recent years. A systematic review was conducted to identify the factors associated with bystander intervention regarding sexual assault on university campuses. Currently, no published systematic reviews exist within this area. Twenty-eight studies were reviewed according to four major bystander factors: rape myth and date rape attitudes; bystander efficacy; bystander intent; and bystander behavior. There was a heavy emphasis on bystander intent and behavior throughout. Three important limitations were identified: (1) all empirical research has been conducted in the USA, yet bystander intervention programs exist outside of the USA, in countries such as the UK, (2) a majority of the studies employed quantitative methodologies and so failed to capture important details such as bystanders' perceptions of sexual assault or what other factors influence the likelihood of intervening, and (3) there were limited attempts to control for factors such as social desirability. This area of research is still in its infancy. Future research should examine in greater detail the factors inhibiting and facilitating bystander intervention. Finally, research outside of the USA is important in developing the literature in this area to effectively inform bystander intervention programs.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 25
页数:13
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] Ajzen I., 1985, ACTION CONTROL, P11
  • [2] Gender Differences in Attitudes and Beliefs Associated With Bystander Behavior and Sexual Assault
    Amar, Angela F.
    Sutherland, Melissa
    Laughon, Kathryn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORENSIC NURSING, 2014, 10 (02) : 84 - 91
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, WILEY INT ENCY MARKE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2000, 182369 NCJ
  • [5] Sexual assault on campus: A multilevel, integrative approach to party rape
    Armstrong, Elizabeth A.
    Hamilton, Laura
    Sweeney, Brian
    [J]. SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 2006, 53 (04) : 483 - 499
  • [6] SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE
    BANDURA, A
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) : 191 - 215
  • [7] Banyard V. L., 2005, 2002WGBX0009 NIT
  • [8] Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation
    Banyard, Victoria L.
    Moynihan, Mary M.
    Plante, Elizabethe G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 35 (04) : 463 - 481
  • [9] How Do We Know If It Works? Measuring Outcomes in Bystander-Focused Abuse Prevention on Campuses
    Banyard, Victoria L.
    Moynihan, Mary M.
    Cares, Alison C.
    Warner, Rebecca
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY OF VIOLENCE, 2014, 4 (01) : 101 - 115
  • [10] Variation in Bystander Behavior Related to Sexual and Intimate Partner Violence Prevention: Correlates in a Sample of College Students
    Banyard, Victoria L.
    Moynihan, Mary M.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY OF VIOLENCE, 2011, 1 (04) : 287 - 301