Communicating for change: a systems thinking approach

被引:4
作者
Banerjee, Durba [1 ]
Lowalekar, Harshal [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management Indore, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
[2] Indian Inst Management Indore, Operat Management & Quantitat Tech, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
关键词
Buy-in; Managing change; Systems thinking; Layers of resistance; Communication; CONSTRAINTS; MANAGEMENT; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1108/JOCM-10-2020-0325
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - This study describes in detail an application of the Theory of Constraints (TOC)-based systems thinking approach towards clear and effective communication in a change management exercise. The same is achieved through the example of a large defence organization that is struggling with a multitude of problems in its stores and purchase departments. Design/methodology/approach - It is demonstrated through the case study how five systems thinking tools - Current Reality Tree (CRT), Evaporating Cloud (EC), Future Reality Tree (FRT), Negative Branch Reservation (NBR) and Prerequisite Tree (PRT) - can be applied in overcoming different layers of resistance and for getting the necessary agreement from the stakeholders for a successful change initiative. Findings - The five logical thinking tools helped answer the three questions - "what to change", "what to change to" and "how to cause the change" (Goldratt, 1990) - satisfactorily and overcome various layers of resistance to get the desired buy-in from the stakeholders for a successful change management exercise. Originality/value - The cause-and-effect based method presented in this work is generic enough and can be adopted for getting a buy-in in a variety of change management contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:1018 / 1035
页数:18
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [11] OVERCOMING RESISTANCE TO CHANGE
    Coch, Lester
    French, John R. P., Jr.
    [J]. HUMAN RELATIONS, 1948, 1 (04) : 512 - 532
  • [12] Prediction of aqueous solubility based on large datasets using several QSPR models utilizing topological structure representation
    Votano, JR
    Parham, M
    Hall, LH
    Kier, LB
    Hall, LM
    [J]. CHEMISTRY & BIODIVERSITY, 2004, 1 (11) : 1829 - 1841
  • [13] Craycroft R., 1983, CHANGE TRADITION AM
  • [14] Del Val MP., 2003, MANAGE DECIS
  • [15] Dent E., 1999, J APPL BEHAV SCI, V35, P25, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0021886399351003, 10.1177/0021886399351003]
  • [16] Dettmer H.William., 2007, The Logical Thinking Process: A Systems Approach 341 to Complex Problem Solving, V2nd
  • [17] THE ROLE OF CONVERSATIONS IN PRODUCING INTENTIONAL CHANGE IN ORGANIZATIONS
    FORD, JD
    FORD, LW
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (03) : 541 - 570
  • [18] Resistance to change: The rest of the story
    Ford, Jeffrey D.
    Ford, Laurie W.
    D'Amelio, Angelo
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2008, 33 (02) : 362 - 377
  • [19] Franklin C., 2012, Solution-focused brief therapy: A handbook of evidence-based practice
  • [20] Goldratt E., 1995, EMBRACING CHANGE VS