Breast Cancer HER2 Equivocal Cases: Is There an Alternative to FISH Testing? A Pilot Study Using Two Different Antibodies Sequentially

被引:0
作者
Yosepovich, Ady [1 ]
Avivi, Camila [1 ]
Bar, Jair [2 ]
Polak-Charcon, Sylvie [1 ]
Mardoukh, Corine [1 ]
Barshack, Iris [1 ]
机构
[1] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, IL-52621 Tel Hashomer, Israel
[2] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Dept Oncol, IL-52621 Tel Hashomer, Israel
来源
ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL | 2010年 / 12卷 / 06期
关键词
HER2; breast cancer; immunohistochemistry; fluorescence in situ hybridization; rabbit monoclonal antibody; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY; GENE AMPLIFICATION; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; CHEMOTHERAPY; TRASTUZUMAB; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: HER2 is an important prognostic and predictive marker in invasive breast cancer. It is currently assessed by immunohistochemistry for protein over-expression and by fluorescence in situ hybridization for gene amplification. The immunohistochemistry-equivocal cases (2+) are currently retested by FISH to determine eligibility for trastuzumab treatment. Retesting by FISH significantly raises the cost of patient management and sometimes delays treatment. The 4B5 is a new, FDA-approved, rabbit monoclonal antibody for HER2 testing. Objectives: To examine the reliability of 4B5 IHC HER2 testing in cases found by CB11 IHC to be HER2 status equivocal. Methods: Twenty-eight invasive breast cancer cases, with an equivocal HER2 status by CB11 IHC, were retested by the 4B5 antibody as well as by FISH analysis. The scoring was performed using the same guidelines as HercepTest and was correlated with the FISH ratio. Results: Of the original 28 CB11 clone designated equivocal cases, 14(50%) showed negative HER2 staining using the 4B5 clone (HercepTest score 0 and 1+). Five cases (18%) proved to be positive (HercepTest score 3+) and 9 cases (32%) remained equivocal (HercepTest score 2+). The corresponding FISH ratio results showed that all 4B5 negative cases were negative by FISH testing, with a negative predictive value of 100%; 4 of 5 of the 4B5-positive cases were positive by FISH testing, with a positive predictive value of 80%. One 4B5-positive case was borderline-high (2.2 ratio) by FISH. The correlation between 485 IHC and FISH was statistically significant (P=0.0013) by chi-square test. Conclusions: Sequential testing by 4B5 IHC could greatly reduce the need for FISH testing in cases considered HER2 equivocal by CB11 IHC. IMAJ 2010; 12: 353-356
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 356
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective study of HER2 FISH results of 836 invasive breast cancers
    Singh, Kamaljeet
    Tantravahi, Umadevi
    Lomme, Michele M.
    Pasquariello, Terese
    Steinhoff, Margaret
    Sung, C. James
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 157 (03) : 405 - 411
  • [22] Comparison of HER2 Dual-Color and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Breast Cancer A Cohort Study Emphasizing Equivocal Cases
    Shao, Tiffany
    Wood, Martha
    Wing, Anthony
    Hnatovska, Marta
    Mendes, Maria
    Mullen, J. Brendan
    Chang, Martin C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 146 (03) : 339 - 345
  • [23] HER2 testing in breast cancer: an overview of current techniques and recent developments
    Pathmanathan, N.
    Bilous, A. Michael
    PATHOLOGY, 2012, 44 (07) : 587 - 595
  • [24] HER2 in well differentiated breast cancer: is testing necessary?
    Haines, G. Kenneth, III
    Wiley, Elizabeth
    Susnik, Barbara
    Apple, Sophia K.
    Frkovic-Grazio, Snjezana
    Reyes, Carolina
    Goldstein, Lynn C.
    Dadmanesh, Farnaz
    Gown, Allen M.
    Nadji, Mehrdad
    Bracko, Matej
    Tavassoli, Fattaneh A.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2008, 112 (03) : 551 - 556
  • [25] HER2 in well differentiated breast cancer: is testing necessary?
    G. Kenneth Haines
    Elizabeth Wiley
    Barbara Susnik
    Sophia K. Apple
    Snjezana Frkovic-Grazio
    Carolina Reyes
    Lynn C. Goldstein
    Farnaz Dadmanesh
    Allen M. Gown
    Mehrdad Nadji
    Matej Bracko
    Fattaneh A. Tavassoli
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2008, 112 : 551 - 556
  • [26] A Comparison of IHC and FISH Cytogenetic Methods in the Evaluation of HER2 Status in Breast Cancer
    Wesola, Marta
    Jelen, Michal
    ADVANCES IN CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 24 (05): : 899 - 903
  • [27] RABBIT ANTIBODIES FOR HORMONE RECEPTORS AND HER2 EVALUATION IN BREAST CANCER
    Rocha, Rafael Malagoli
    Nunes, Cristiana Buzelin
    Fernandes Sanches, Fernanda Squarcio
    Silva Rocha, Gislene Fatima
    de Oliveira, Flavio Nepomuceno
    Reis-Filho, Jorge Sergio
    Lambros, Maryou B.
    Gobbi, Helenice
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2009, 55 (02): : 163 - 168
  • [28] Can breast cancer patients with HER2 dual-equivocal tumours be managed as HER2-negative disease?
    Tong, Yiwei
    Chen, Xiaosong
    Fei, Xiaochun
    Lin, Lin
    Wu, Jiayi
    Huang, Ou
    He, Jianrong
    Zhu, Li
    Chen, Weiguo
    Li, Yafen
    Shen, Kunwei
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 89 : 9 - 18
  • [29] Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 guidelines update for HER2 testing by FISH in breast cancer
    Xu, Bin
    Shen, Jianguo
    Guo, Wenhao
    Zhao, Wenhe
    Zhuang, Yiyu
    Wang, Linbo
    PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2019, 215 (02) : 251 - 255
  • [30] Quantitative PCR and HER2 testing in breast cancer
    Barberis, Massimo
    Pellegrini, Caterina
    Cannone, Maria
    Arizzi, Carmelo
    Coggi, Guido
    Bosari, Silvano
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2008, 129 (04) : 563 - 570