Evaluation of the seismicity for the Marmara region with statistical approaches

被引:8
作者
Sayil, Nilgun [1 ]
机构
[1] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Geophys, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkey
关键词
Marmara region; Gutenberg Richter relationship; Maximum likelihood method; Poisson model; Seismicity; EARTHQUAKE; TURKEY; SLIP; SEA; RUPTURE; HAZARD; PARAMETERS; STRESS; MODELS; IZMIT;
D O I
10.1007/s40328-014-0058-4
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The Marmara region has been divided into six sub-regions having regard to the certain seismotectonic characteristics of the region, to study the seismicity. For this, the data belonging to both the historical and instrumental period has been used. The probabilities of earthquake recurrences were obtained by using Poisson statistical distribution models. Gutenberg-Richter (GR) relationship for each sub-region has been computed and, a-and b-values known as seismic hazard scaling parameters have been determined by linear least square (LLS) method and maximum likelihood (ML) method. The highest and the lowest b-values determined by LLS are found for sub-region 4 (Saros Gulf, 0.74 +/- 0.08) and sub-region 1 (Duzce, 0.56 +/- 0.06), respectively. The highest a-value for sub-region 4 as 5.05 +/- 0.05 and the lowest a- value for sub- region 3 (Tekirdag) as 4.12 +/- 0.02 are found. Likewise, the calculated lowest and highest b-values with ML are 0.55 +/- 0.05 for sub- region 1 and 0.68 +/- 0.07 for sub- region 4, respectively. Also, b-value for all region (108 years and M-S >= 4.0) are estimated as 0.71 +/- 0.03 with LLS and 0.65 +/- 0.02 with ML. The highest earthquake occurrence probabilities of M-S >= 7.0 in the next 100 years according to the Poisson distribution are found as 74.4% for sub- region 1 (Duzce), 58.6% for sub- region 2 (Izmit), 54.3% for sub- region 3 (Tekirdag) and 49.7% for sub- region 5 (Bandirma). The shortest recurrence period for the earthquake with the same magnitude is determined as 73 years for sub- region 1.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 281
页数:17
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Aki K., 1965, B EARTHQ RES I TOKYO, V43, P237, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1365-246X.-2008.04059.X
[2]   Assessment of the statistical earthquake hazard parameters for NW Turkey [J].
Akol, Banu ;
Bekler, Tolga .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2013, 68 (02) :837-853
[3]   Alternative models of seismic hazard evaluation along the Jordan-Dead Sea transform [J].
Al-Tarazi, Eid ;
Sandvol, Eric .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2007, 23 (01) :1-19
[4]  
Alsan E., 1975, An Earthquake Catalogue for Turkey for the Interval 1913 - 1970
[5]   The seismic activity of the Marmara Sea region over the last 2000 years [J].
Ambraseys, N .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2002, 92 (01) :1-18
[6]   Reassessment of earthquakes, 1900-1999, in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East [J].
Ambraseys, NN .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 145 (02) :471-485
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1974, NATO ADV STUDY I SER
[8]   Asymmetric slip partitioning in the Sea of Marmara pull-apart: a clue to propagation processes of the North Anatolian Fault? [J].
Armijo, R ;
Meyer, B ;
Navarro, S ;
King, G ;
Barka, A .
TERRA NOVA, 2002, 14 (02) :80-86
[9]  
Barka A, 1997, ANN GEOFIS, V40, P587, DOI DOI 10.4401/AG-3892
[10]  
Barka A. A., 1992, Annales Tectonicae, V6, P164