Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement

被引：535

作者：

Bland, J. Martin ^{[1
,2
]}

Altman, Douglas G. ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ London St Georges Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Social Med, London SW17, England

[2] Northwick Pk Hosp & Clin Res Ctr, MRC, Clin Res Ctr, Div Med Stat, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES | 2010年 / 47卷 / 08期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.10.001

中图分类号：

R47 [护理学];

学科分类号：

1011 ;

摘要：

In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often needed to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old. Such investigations are often analysed inappropriately, notably by using correlation coefficients. The use of correlation is misleading. An alternative approach, based on graphical techniques and simple calculations, is described, together with the relation between this analysis and the assessment of repeatability. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：931 / 936

页数：6

共 8 条

[1] MEASUREMENT IN MEDICINE - THE ANALYSIS OF METHOD COMPARISON STUDIES [J].