Effects of Liquid Urea Application Frequency on the Growth and Grain Yield of Corn (Zea mays L.)

被引:5
作者
Motasim, Ahmmed Md [1 ]
Samsuri, Abd Wahid [1 ]
Sukor, Arina Shairah Abdul [1 ]
Amin, Adibah Mohd [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Putra Malaysia, Fac Agr, Dept Land Management, Serdang, Malaysia
关键词
Corn; splits application; liquid urea; granular urea; grain yield; NUE; NITROGEN USE; USE EFFICIENCY; WATER; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS; SOILS; TIME;
D O I
10.1080/00103624.2022.2071435
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Efficient nitrogen (N) management is considered one of the most important strategies for increasing sustainable crop yield along with maximizing nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of liquid urea (LU) application frequency on the growth, yield, and NUE of grain corn (Zea mays L.). The application frequencies urea were two split (2S) applied equally at 10 and 28 days after sowing (DAS), three split (3S) applied equally at 10, 40, and 65 DAS, and four split (4S) applied equally at 10, 30, 50, and 70 DAS organized by following randomized completely block design with four replicates. Results showed that stem diameter, ear length, fresh and dry stover weight, fresh cob weight, husk weight, kernel row/cob, and grain yield were higher in the LU treatments than granular urea (GU). Among all the treatments, the grain corn receiving LU3S had the highest stem diameter (2.03 cm), cob weight (248.25 g), 100 grain weight (29.08 g), N uptake (133.96 kg/ha), and NUE (72.84%). The corn grain yield of LU3S was 6.77 t/ha compared to the GU2S, which was only 4.95 t/ha. The N uptake along with NUE was significantly higher in LU3S treatment than other treatments. The results of this study suggest that the yield and NUE of corn were significantly affected by the urea source and application frequency of LU while LU3S was the most efficient treatment for maximizing the growth and yield of grain corn grown in tropical soil.
引用
收藏
页码:2245 / 2256
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Abebe Z, 2017, INT J AGRON, V2017, DOI 10.1155/2017/1545280
[2]   Maize response to time of nitrogen application and planting seasons [J].
Adhikari, Parbati ;
Baral, Bandhu Raj ;
Shrestha, Jiban .
JOURNAL OF MAIZE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 2 (01) :83-93
[3]  
Anim M., 2017, BLOG AGR TECHNOLOGY
[4]  
Boyer C.N., 2010, CROP PRODUCTION IND, V26, P26, DOI [10.22004/ag.econ.61153, DOI 10.22004/AG.ECON.61153]
[5]   Prospects of improving efficiency of fertiliser nitrogen in Australian agriculture: a review of enhanced efficiency fertilisers [J].
Chen, D. ;
Suter, H. ;
Islam, A. ;
Edis, R. ;
Freney, J. R. ;
Walker, C. N. .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 2008, 46 (04) :289-301
[6]   A comprehensive study of plant density consequences on nitrogen uptake dynamics of maize plants from vegetative to reproductive stages [J].
Ciampitti, Ignacio A. ;
Vyn, Tony J. .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2011, 121 (01) :2-18
[7]  
Cropnuts, 2020, TOP DRESS FERT MAIZ
[8]  
Culman S., 2020, IS IT TOO LATE FERTI
[9]  
DAO, 2003, CROP STAT MAL 2001
[10]   Rice yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency under alternative straw management practices [J].
Eagle, AJ ;
Bird, JA ;
Horwath, WR ;
Linquist, BA ;
Brouder, SM ;
Hill, JE ;
van Kessel, C .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2000, 92 (06) :1096-1103