Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae - Biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength

被引:244
作者
Burval, Daniel J. [1 ]
McLain, Robert F. [1 ]
Milks, Ryan [1 ]
Inceoglu, Serkan [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Orthopaed, Cleveland Clin Spine Inst, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
pedicle screw fixation; polymethyl methacrylate augmentation; osteoporosis; pullout failure; spine biomechanics;
D O I
10.1097/01.brs.0000261566.38422.40
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Pedicle screw pullout testing in osteoporotic and control human cadaveric vertebrae, comparing augmented and control vertebrae. Objective. To compare the pullout strengths of pedicle screws fixed in osteoporotic vertebrae using polymethyl methacrylate delivered by 2 augmentation techniques, a standard transpedicular approach and kyphoplasty type approach. Summary of Background Data. Pedicle screw instrumentation of the osteoporotic spine carries an increased risk of screw loosening, pullout, and fixation failure. Osteoporosis is often cited as a contraindication for pedicle screw fixation. Augmentation of the vertebral pedicle and body using polymethyl methacrylate may improve fixation strength and construct survival in the osteoporotic vertebrae. While the utility of polymethyl methacrylate has been demonstrated for salvage of screws that have been pulled out, the effect of the cement technique on pullout strength in osteoporotic vertebrae has not been previously studied. Methods. Thirteen osteoporotic and 9 healthy human lumbar vertebrae were tested. All specimens were instrumented with pedicle screws using a uniform technique. Osteoporotic pedicles were augmented with polymethyl methacrylate using either a kyphoplasty type technique or a transpedicular augmentation technique. Screws were tested in a paired testing array, randomly assigning the augmentation techniques to opposite sides of each vertebra. Pullout to failure was performed either primarily or after a 5000-cycle tangential fatigue conditioning exposure. After testing, following screw removal, specimens were cut in the axial plane through the center of the vertebral body to inspect the cement distribution. Results. Pedicle screws placed in osteoporotic vertebrae had higher pullout loads when augmented with the kyphoplasty technique compared to transpedicular augmentation (1414 +/- 338 versus 756 +/- 300 N, respectively; P < 0.001). An unpaired t test showed that fatigued pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae augmented by kyphoplasty showed higher pullout resistance than those placed in healthy control vertebrae (P = 0.002). Both kyphoplasty type augmentation (P = 0.007) and transpedicular augmentation (P = 0.02) increased pullout loads compared to pedicle screws placed in nonaugmented osteoporotic vertebrae when tested after fatigue cycling. Conclusions. Pedicle screw augmentation with polymethyl methacrylate improves the initial fixation strength and fatigue strength of instrumentation in osteoporotic vertebrae. Pedicle screws augmented using the kyphoplasty technique had significantly greater pullout strength than those augmented with transpedicular augmentation technique and those placed in healthy control vertebrae with no augmentation.
引用
收藏
页码:1077 / 1083
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Abshire B B, 2001, Spine J, V1, P408, DOI 10.1016/S1529-9430(01)00119-X
  • [2] Percutaneous transpedicular polymethyl methacrylate vertebroplasty for the treatment of spinal compression fractures
    Amar, AP
    Larsen, DW
    Esnaashari, N
    Albuquerque, FC
    Lavine, SD
    Teitelbaum, GP
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2001, 49 (05) : 1105 - 1114
  • [3] USE OF POLYMETHYLMETHACRYLATE TO ENHANCE SCREW FIXATION IN BONE
    CAMERON, HU
    JACOB, R
    MACNAB, I
    PILLIAR, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1975, 57 (05) : 655 - 656
  • [4] Pulmonary embolism of polymethyl methacrylate during percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty
    Choe, DH
    Marom, EM
    Ahrar, K
    Truong, MT
    Madewell, JE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 183 (04) : 1097 - 1102
  • [5] Cook S D, 2001, Spine J, V1, P109, DOI 10.1016/S1529-9430(01)00020-1
  • [6] Biomechanical evaluation and preliminary clinical experience with an expansive pedicle screw design
    Cook, SD
    Salkeld, SL
    Whitecloud, TS
    Barbera, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 2000, 13 (03): : 230 - 236
  • [7] Cook Stephen D, 2004, Spine J, V4, P402, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.11.010
  • [8] COSTANTINO PD, 1991, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V117, P379
  • [9] Complications of spinal fusion in adult patients more than 60 years of age
    Fujita, T
    Kostuik, JP
    Huckell, CB
    Sieber, AN
    [J]. ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1998, 29 (04) : 669 - +
  • [10] Glassman Steven D, 2003, Instr Course Lect, V52, P579