An at-site flood estimation method in the context of nonstationarity I. A simulation study

被引:32
作者
Gado, Tamer A. [1 ]
Van-Thanh-Van Nguyen [2 ]
机构
[1] Tanta Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Irrigat & Hydraul Engn, Tanta, Egypt
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Civil Engn & Appl Mech, 817 Sherbrooke St West, Montreal, PQ H3A 2K6, Canada
关键词
Nonstationary flood frequency analysis; L-moments; GEV distribution; Monte Carlo simulations; EXTREME-VALUE ANALYSIS; FREQUENCY-ANALYSIS; TRENDS; VARIABILITY; SERIES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.063
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The stationarity of annual flood peak records is the traditional assumption of flood frequency analysis. In some cases, however, as a result of land-use and/or climate change, this assumption is no longer valid. Therefore, new statistical models are needed to capture dynamically the change of probability density functions over time, in order to obtain reliable flood estimation. In this study, an innovative method for nonstationary flood frequency analysis was presented. Here, the new method is based on detrending the flood series and applying the L-moments along with the GEV distribution to the transformed "stationary" series (hereafter, this is called the LM-NS). The LM-NS method was assessed through a comparative study with the maximum likelihood (ML) method for the nonstationary GEV model, as well as with the stationary (S) GEV model. The comparative study, based on Monte Carlo simulations, was carried out for three nonstationary GEV models: a linear dependence of the mean on time (GEV1), a quadratic dependence of the mean on time (GEV2), and linear dependence in both the mean and log standard deviation on time (GEV11). The simulation results indicated that the LM-NS method performs better than the ML method for most of the cases studied, whereas the stationary method provides the least accurate results. An additional advantage of the LM-NS method is to avoid the numerical problems (e.g., convergence problems) that may occur with the ML method when estimating parameters for small data samples. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:710 / 721
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], INFRASTRUCTURE 2030
  • [2] At what scales do climate variability and land cover change impact on flooding and low flows?
    Bloeschl, Guenter
    Ardoin-Bardin, Sandra
    Bonell, Mike
    Dorninger, Manfred
    Goodrich, David
    Gutknecht, Dieter
    Matamoros, David
    Merz, Bruno
    Shand, Paul
    Szolgay, Jan
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2007, 21 (09) : 1241 - 1247
  • [3] Bobee B., 1993, ENG RISK NAT RES MAN, P177
  • [4] Detection of hydrologic trends and variability
    Burn, DH
    Elnur, MAH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2002, 255 (1-4) : 107 - 122
  • [5] Coles S., 2001, An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4471-3675-0, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-3675-0]
  • [6] Regional flood-duration-frequency modeling in the changing environment
    Cunderlik, JM
    Ouarda, TBMJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 318 (1-4) : 276 - 291
  • [7] Non-stationary pooled flood frequency analysis
    Cunderlik, JM
    Burn, DH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2003, 276 (1-4) : 210 - 223
  • [8] Flood trends and variability in the Mekong river
    Delgado, J. M.
    Apel, H.
    Merz, B.
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2010, 14 (03) : 407 - 418
  • [9] Trends in floods and low flows in the United States: impact of spatial correlation
    Douglas, EM
    Vogel, RM
    Kroll, CN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2000, 240 (1-2) : 90 - 105
  • [10] SHUFFLED COMPLEX EVOLUTION APPROACH FOR EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT GLOBAL MINIMIZATION
    DUAN, QY
    GUPTA, VK
    SOROOSHIAN, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1993, 76 (03) : 501 - 521