Mapping between the Roland Morris Questionnaire and Generic Preference-Based Measures

被引:18
|
作者
Khan, Kamran A. [1 ]
Madan, Jason [1 ]
Petrou, Stavros [1 ]
Lamb, Sarah E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Div Hlth Sci, Warwick Clin Trials Unit, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Rheumatol & Musculoskelet, Med Sci Div, Oxford, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cross-walking; EQ-5D; health-related quality of life; health utilities; low back pain; LBP; mapping; RMQ ST-6D; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EQ-5D UTILITY VALUES; LOW-BACK-PAIN; HEALTH; CARE; MODELS; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; OUTCOMES; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2014.07.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: The Roland Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a widely used health status measure for low back pain (LOP). It is not preference-based, and there are currently no established algorithms for mapping between the RMQ and preference-based health-related quality-of-life measures. Using data from randomized controlled trials of treatment for LBP, we sought to develop algorithms for mapping between RMQ scores and health utilities derived using either the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-SD) or the six-dimensional health state short form (derived from Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey) (SF-6D). Methods: This study is based on data from the Back Skills Training Trial in which data were collected from 701 patients at baseline and subsequently at 3, 6, and 12 months postrandomization using a range of outcome measures, including the RMQ the EQ-5D, and the Short Form 12 item Health Survey (SF-12) (from which SF-6D utilities can be derived). We used baseline trial data to estimate models using both direct and response mapping approaches to predict EQ-5D and SF-6D health utilities and dimension responses. A multistage model selection process was used to assess the predictive accuracy of the models. We then explored different techniques and mapping models that made use of repeated follow-up observations in the data The estimated mapping algorithms were validated using external data from the UK Back Pain Exercise and Manipulation trial. Results: A number of models were developed that accurately predict health utilities in this context. The best performing model for RMQ to EQ-SD mapping was a beta regression with Bayesian quasi-likelihood estimation that included 24 dummy variables for RMQ responses, age, and sex as covariates (mean squared error 0.0380) based on repeated data The model selected for RMQ to SF-6D mapping was a finite mixture model that included the overall RMQ score, age, sex, RMQ score squared, age squared, and an interaction term for age and RMQ score as covariates (mean squared error 0.0114) based on repeated data. Conclusions: It is possible to reasonably predict EQ-5D and SF-6D health utilities from RMQ scores and responses using regression methods. Our regression equations provide an empirical basis for estimating health utilities when EQ-5D or SF-6D data are not available. They can be used to inform future economic evaluations of interventions targeting LBP.
引用
收藏
页码:686 / 695
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Preference-Based Measures in Dermatology: An Overview of Utilities and Willingness to Pay
    Seidler, Anne M.
    Kini, Seema P.
    DeLong, Laura K.
    Veledar, Emir
    Chen, Suephy C.
    DERMATOLOGIC CLINICS, 2012, 30 (02) : 223 - +
  • [42] Using preference-based measures to assess quality of life in stuttering
    Bramlett, RE
    Bothe, AK
    Franic, DM
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2006, 49 (02): : 381 - 394
  • [43] Measurement Properties of Commonly Used Generic Preference-Based Measures in East and South-East Asia: A Systematic Review
    Qian, Xinyu
    Tan, Rachel Lee-Yin
    Chuang, Ling-Hsiang
    Luo, Nan
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2020, 38 (02) : 159 - 170
  • [44] Commentary. In Praise of Studies That Use More Than One Generic Preference-Based Measure
    Feeny, David
    Furlong, William
    Torrance, George W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2019, 35 (04) : 257 - 262
  • [45] A comparison of directly elicited and pre-scored preference-based measures of quality of life: the case of adhesive capsulitis
    Harris, Anthony H.
    Youd, Joanne
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2013, 22 (10) : 2963 - 2971
  • [46] Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients
    Breheny, Katie
    Hollingworth, William
    Kandiyali, Rebecca
    Dixon, Padraig
    Loose, Abi
    Craggs, Pippa
    Grzeda, Mariusz
    Sparrow, John
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (07) : 1935 - 1946
  • [47] Comparing Generic and Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measures in Epilepsy: EQ-5D-3L and NEWQOL-6D
    Mulhern, Brendan
    Pink, Joshua
    Rowen, Donna
    Borghs, Simon
    Butt, Thomas
    Hughes, Dyfrig
    Marson, Antony
    Brazier, John
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (04) : 687 - 693
  • [48] Preference-based quality-of-life measures for neocortical epilepsy surgery
    Knowlton, Robert C.
    Kar, Jitesh
    Miller, Suzanne
    Limdi, Nita
    Elgavish, Rotem
    Gilliam, Frank G.
    Riley, Kristen
    Howell, Jennifer
    Kilgore, Meredith
    EPILEPSIA, 2011, 52 (05) : 1018 - 1020
  • [49] Estimating the Relationship between Preference-Based Generic Utility Instruments and Disease-Specific Quality-of-Life Measures in Severe Chronic Constipation Challenges in Practice
    Parker, Mark
    Haycox, Alan
    Graves, Jane
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2011, 29 (08) : 719 - 730
  • [50] Preference-based measures of health-related quality of life in Indigenous people: a systematic review
    Roy, Lilla M.
    Neill, Aidan
    Swampy, Kristen
    Auger, Juliette
    Campbell, Sandra M.
    Chatwood, Susan
    Al Sayah, Fatima
    Johnson, Jeffrey A.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2024, 33 (02) : 317 - 333