Mapping between the Roland Morris Questionnaire and Generic Preference-Based Measures

被引:18
|
作者
Khan, Kamran A. [1 ]
Madan, Jason [1 ]
Petrou, Stavros [1 ]
Lamb, Sarah E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Div Hlth Sci, Warwick Clin Trials Unit, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Rheumatol & Musculoskelet, Med Sci Div, Oxford, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cross-walking; EQ-5D; health-related quality of life; health utilities; low back pain; LBP; mapping; RMQ ST-6D; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EQ-5D UTILITY VALUES; LOW-BACK-PAIN; HEALTH; CARE; MODELS; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; OUTCOMES; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2014.07.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: The Roland Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a widely used health status measure for low back pain (LOP). It is not preference-based, and there are currently no established algorithms for mapping between the RMQ and preference-based health-related quality-of-life measures. Using data from randomized controlled trials of treatment for LBP, we sought to develop algorithms for mapping between RMQ scores and health utilities derived using either the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-SD) or the six-dimensional health state short form (derived from Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey) (SF-6D). Methods: This study is based on data from the Back Skills Training Trial in which data were collected from 701 patients at baseline and subsequently at 3, 6, and 12 months postrandomization using a range of outcome measures, including the RMQ the EQ-5D, and the Short Form 12 item Health Survey (SF-12) (from which SF-6D utilities can be derived). We used baseline trial data to estimate models using both direct and response mapping approaches to predict EQ-5D and SF-6D health utilities and dimension responses. A multistage model selection process was used to assess the predictive accuracy of the models. We then explored different techniques and mapping models that made use of repeated follow-up observations in the data The estimated mapping algorithms were validated using external data from the UK Back Pain Exercise and Manipulation trial. Results: A number of models were developed that accurately predict health utilities in this context. The best performing model for RMQ to EQ-SD mapping was a beta regression with Bayesian quasi-likelihood estimation that included 24 dummy variables for RMQ responses, age, and sex as covariates (mean squared error 0.0380) based on repeated data The model selected for RMQ to SF-6D mapping was a finite mixture model that included the overall RMQ score, age, sex, RMQ score squared, age squared, and an interaction term for age and RMQ score as covariates (mean squared error 0.0114) based on repeated data. Conclusions: It is possible to reasonably predict EQ-5D and SF-6D health utilities from RMQ scores and responses using regression methods. Our regression equations provide an empirical basis for estimating health utilities when EQ-5D or SF-6D data are not available. They can be used to inform future economic evaluations of interventions targeting LBP.
引用
收藏
页码:686 / 695
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire Target Value to Distinguish between Functional and Dysfunctional States in People with Low Back Pain
    Stratford, Paul W.
    Riddle, Daniel L.
    PHYSIOTHERAPY CANADA, 2016, 68 (01) : 29 - 35
  • [32] Preferred reporting items for studies mapping onto preference-based outcome measures: the MAPS statement
    Stavros Petrou
    Oliver Rivero-Arias
    Helen Dakin
    Louise Longworth
    Mark Oppe
    Robert Froud
    Alastair Gray
    Quality of Life Research, 2016, 25 : 275 - 281
  • [33] Relationship between changes in physical function parameters and Roland-Morris disability questionnaire score after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis
    Takenaka, Hiroto
    Sugiura, Hideshi
    Kamiya, Mitsuhiro
    Nishihama, Kasuri
    Ito, Atsuki
    Suzuki, Junya
    Kawamura, Morio
    Hanamura, Shuntaro
    NAGOYA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 84 (03): : 570 - 579
  • [34] Assessing the Content Validity of Preference-Based Measures in Cancer
    Gibson, Adam E. J.
    Longworth, Louise
    Bennett, Bryan
    Pickard, A. Simon
    Shaw, James W.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (01) : 70 - 78
  • [35] Common Scale Valuations across Different Preference-Based Measures: Estimation Using Rank Data
    Alava, Monica Hernandez
    Brazier, John
    Rowen, Donna
    Tsuchiya, Aki
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2013, 33 (06) : 839 - 852
  • [36] Estimating Preference-Based Single Index Measures for Dementia Using DEMQOL and DEMQOL-Proxy
    Rowen, Donna
    Mulhern, Brendan
    Banerjee, Sube
    van Hout, Ben
    Young, Tracey A.
    Knapp, Martin
    Smith, Sarah C.
    Lamping, Donna L.
    Brazier, John E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (02) : 346 - 356
  • [37] China Health Related Outcomes Measures (CHROME): Development of a New Generic Preference-Based Measure for the Chinese Population
    Wu, Jing
    He, Xiaoning
    Chen, Pinan
    Xie, Shitong
    Li, Xue
    Hu, Hao
    Zhao, Kun
    Xie, Feng
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2022, 40 (10) : 957 - 969
  • [38] The ability of cancer-specific and generic preference-based instruments to discriminate across clinical and self-reported measures of cancer severities
    Teckle, Paulos
    Peacock, Stuart
    McTaggart-Cowan, Helen
    van der Hoek, Kim
    Chia, Stephen
    Melosky, Barb
    Gelmon, Karen
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2011, 9 : 106
  • [39] A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Preference-Based Instruments with the Older Population
    Cleland, Jenny
    Hutchinson, Claire
    Khadka, Jyoti
    Milte, Rachel
    Ratcliffe, Julie
    APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2019, 17 (06) : 781 - 801
  • [40] Preference-based quality of life measures in people with visual impairment
    Kymes, Steven M.
    Lee, Bryan S.
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2007, 84 (08) : 809 - 816