Mapping between the Roland Morris Questionnaire and Generic Preference-Based Measures

被引:18
|
作者
Khan, Kamran A. [1 ]
Madan, Jason [1 ]
Petrou, Stavros [1 ]
Lamb, Sarah E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Div Hlth Sci, Warwick Clin Trials Unit, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Rheumatol & Musculoskelet, Med Sci Div, Oxford, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cross-walking; EQ-5D; health-related quality of life; health utilities; low back pain; LBP; mapping; RMQ ST-6D; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EQ-5D UTILITY VALUES; LOW-BACK-PAIN; HEALTH; CARE; MODELS; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; OUTCOMES; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2014.07.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: The Roland Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a widely used health status measure for low back pain (LOP). It is not preference-based, and there are currently no established algorithms for mapping between the RMQ and preference-based health-related quality-of-life measures. Using data from randomized controlled trials of treatment for LBP, we sought to develop algorithms for mapping between RMQ scores and health utilities derived using either the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-SD) or the six-dimensional health state short form (derived from Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey) (SF-6D). Methods: This study is based on data from the Back Skills Training Trial in which data were collected from 701 patients at baseline and subsequently at 3, 6, and 12 months postrandomization using a range of outcome measures, including the RMQ the EQ-5D, and the Short Form 12 item Health Survey (SF-12) (from which SF-6D utilities can be derived). We used baseline trial data to estimate models using both direct and response mapping approaches to predict EQ-5D and SF-6D health utilities and dimension responses. A multistage model selection process was used to assess the predictive accuracy of the models. We then explored different techniques and mapping models that made use of repeated follow-up observations in the data The estimated mapping algorithms were validated using external data from the UK Back Pain Exercise and Manipulation trial. Results: A number of models were developed that accurately predict health utilities in this context. The best performing model for RMQ to EQ-SD mapping was a beta regression with Bayesian quasi-likelihood estimation that included 24 dummy variables for RMQ responses, age, and sex as covariates (mean squared error 0.0380) based on repeated data The model selected for RMQ to SF-6D mapping was a finite mixture model that included the overall RMQ score, age, sex, RMQ score squared, age squared, and an interaction term for age and RMQ score as covariates (mean squared error 0.0114) based on repeated data. Conclusions: It is possible to reasonably predict EQ-5D and SF-6D health utilities from RMQ scores and responses using regression methods. Our regression equations provide an empirical basis for estimating health utilities when EQ-5D or SF-6D data are not available. They can be used to inform future economic evaluations of interventions targeting LBP.
引用
收藏
页码:686 / 695
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Correspondence between symptoms and preference-based health status measures in the STOP study
    Gold, Laura S.
    Patrick, Donald L.
    Hansen, Ryan N.
    Beckett, Valeria
    Goss, Christopher H.
    Kessler, Larry
    JOURNAL OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS, 2019, 18 (02) : 251 - 264
  • [22] Preferred reporting items for studies mapping onto preference-based outcome measures: The MAPS statement
    Petrou, Stavros
    Rivero-Arias, Oliver
    Dakin, Helen
    Longworth, Louise
    Oppe, Mark
    Froud, Robert
    Gray, Alastair
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2015, 13
  • [23] Preferred Reporting Items for Studies Mapping onto Preference-Based Outcome Measures: The MAPS Statement
    Petrou, Stavros
    Rivero-Arias, Oliver
    Dakin, Helen
    Longworth, Louise
    Oppe, Mark
    Froud, Robert
    Gray, Alastair
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2015, 33 (10) : 985 - 991
  • [24] Preferred Reporting Items for Studies Mapping onto Preference-Based Outcome Measures: The MAPS Statement
    Petrou, Stavros
    Rivero-Arias, Oliver
    Dakin, Helen
    Longworth, Louise
    Oppe, Mark
    Froud, Robert
    Gray, Alastair
    APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2015, 13 (05) : 437 - 443
  • [25] Fibromyalgia and quality of life: mapping the revised fibromyalgia impact questionnaire to the preference-based instruments
    Collado-Mateo, Daniel
    Chen, Gang
    Garcia-Gordillo, Miguel A.
    Iezzi, Angelo
    Adsuar, Jose C.
    Olivares, Pedro R.
    Gusi, Narcis
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2017, 15
  • [26] Mapping scores from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to preference-based utility values
    Furber, Gareth
    Segal, Leonie
    Leach, Matthew
    Cocks, Jane
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 (02) : 403 - 411
  • [27] Mapping scores from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to preference-based utility values
    Gareth Furber
    Leonie Segal
    Matthew Leach
    Jane Cocks
    Quality of Life Research, 2014, 23 : 403 - 411
  • [28] Should Linking Replace Regression When Mapping from Profile-Based Measures to Preference-Based Measures?
    Fayers, Peter M.
    Hays, Ron D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (02) : 261 - 265
  • [29] Mapping the FACT-P to the Preference-Based EQ-5D Questionnaire in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
    Skaltsa, Konstantina
    Longworth, Louise
    Ivanescu, Cristina
    De Phung
    Holmstrom, Stefan
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (02) : 238 - 244
  • [30] Applying the results of self-report measures to individual patients: An example using the Roland-Morris questionnaire
    Stratford, PW
    Binkley, JM
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1999, 29 (04): : 232 - 239