Linkage between Service Delivery and Administrative Advocacy: Comparative Evidence on Cliques from a Mental Health Network in the US and an Elderly Care Network in China

被引：4

作者：

Huang, Kun ^{[1
]}

Chen, Bin ^{[2
,3
,4
]}

Yang, Beilei ^{[5
]}

Zou, Shanshan ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Univ New Mexico, Sch Publ Adm, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA

[2] CUNY, Baruch Coll, Marxe Sch Publ & Int Affairs, One Bernard Baruch Way,Box D-0901, New York, NY 10010 USA

[3] CUNY, Grad Ctr, New York, NY USA

[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, China Inst Urban Governance, Shanghai, Peoples R China

[5] Tongji Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Dept Publ Adm, Shanghai, Peoples R China

来源：

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS | 2019年 / 21卷 / 05期

关键词：

service delivery collaboration; administrative advocacy; comparative network analysis; urban governance; POLICY ADVOCACY; UNITED-STATES; SIMMELIAN TIES; POLITICS; ORGANIZATIONS; NONPROFITS; KNOWLEDGE; CHALLENGES; COALITIONS; SURVIVAL;

D O I：

10.1080/13876988.2019.1609780

中图分类号：

C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];

学科分类号：

12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;

摘要：

Third-party service providers often collaborate in both service delivery and administrative advocacy. Yet the linkage between such collaboration has been overlooked. The article studies how joint advocacy inside two government-funded service delivery networks are formed, based on the concepts of service provider clique overlap, multiplexity, and resource tangibility. Comparative network analysis of data from a mental health services network in the US and a community-based elderly care network in China showed consistent support for the linkage between service provider cliques and joint administrative advocacy. Theoretically, it advances the study of advocacy coalitions by highlighting the nuanced effects of service provider cliques on advocacy partnerships.

引用

页码：535 / 555

页数：21