Enhancing the value of radiology reports: a primer for residents

被引:3
作者
Petraszko, Andrew [1 ]
Chagarlamudi, Kaushik [1 ]
Ramaiya, Nikhil [1 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Univ Hosp Cleveland, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
Resident education; Reporting style; Template reporting; MEDICAL MALPRACTICE SUITS; REFERRING CLINICIAN; TERMINOLOGY; ERRORS; CARE; COMMUNICATION; ISSUES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10140-022-02045-1
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose The radiology report is the primary work product of the diagnostic radiologist. Its quality is a direct reflection of his or her knowledge, experience, and confidence. Certain factors hindering one's ability to deliver a diagnostically accurate and concise report are sometimes unavoidable (e.g., study limitations and insufficient history); however, radiologists who routinely produce deficient reports not only erode their credibility and reputation amongst colleagues, they magnify their risk of litigation. Methods This article is directed toward radiology residents to help facilitate the adoption of effective reporting habits. Results and conclusion Up to 92% of referring physicians and 95% of radiologists agree that learning to report should be an "obligatory and well-structured" component of radiology residency education as discussed by Bosmans JM, Weyler JJ, De Schepper AM, and Parizel PM. Unfortunately, this remains the exception rather than the rule. This article is written with the following objectives: (1) to identify strategies that improve the value of radiology reporting, (2) to define the features of a high-quality radiology report, (3) to instill trust and respect from referring clinicians through clear, accurate, and effective communication, and (4) to understand and avoid potential medicolegal ramifications of deficient radiology reports.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 682
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] American College of Radiology, ACR INFORMATICS ACRA
  • [2] The Malpractice Liability of Radiology Reports: Minimizing the Risk
    Babu, Aparna Srinivasa
    Brooks, Michael L.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2015, 35 (02) : 547 - 554
  • [3] The Demography of Medical Malpractice Suits against Radiologists
    Baker, Stephen R.
    Whang, Jeremy S.
    Luk, Lyndon
    Clarkin, Kim S.
    Castro, Alejandro, III
    Patel, Ronak
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2013, 266 (02) : 539 - 547
  • [4] Malpractice issues in radiology - Pitfalls of the vague radiology report
    Berlin, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (06) : 1511 - 1518
  • [5] Malpractice issues in radiology - Communicating findings of radiologic examinations: Whither goest the radiologist's duty?
    Berlin, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (04) : 809 - 815
  • [6] Communicating results of all radiologic examinations directly to patients: Has the time come?
    Berlin, Leonard
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (06) : 1275 - 1282
  • [7] Legal Outcome of a Failure to Communicate an Unexpected Finding
    Berlin, Leonard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 15 (10) : 1356 - 1358
  • [8] Bosmans JML, 2011, INSIGHTS IMAGING, V2, P577, DOI 10.1007/s13244-011-0118-z
  • [9] The Radiology Report as Seen by Radiologists and Referring Clinicians: Results of the COVER and ROVER Surveys
    Bosmans, Jan M. L.
    Weyler, Joost J.
    De Schepper, Arthur M.
    Parizel, Paul M.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2011, 259 (01) : 184 - 195
  • [10] Nonstandardized Terminology to Describe Focal Liver Lesions in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Implications Regarding Clinical Communication
    Corwin, Michael T.
    Lee, Andrew Y.
    Fananapazir, Ghaneh
    Loehfelm, Thomas W.
    Sarkar, Souvik
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (01) : 85 - 90