Native Perennial Forb Variation Between Mountain Big Sagebrush and Wyoming Big Sagebrush Plant Communities

被引:12
作者
Davies, Kirk W. [1 ]
Bates, Jon D. [1 ]
机构
[1] ARS, USDA, Eastern Oregon Agr Res Ctr, Burns, OR 97720 USA
关键词
Artemisia tridentate; Composition; Diversity; Habitat; Indicator species analysis; Ordination; SAGE-GROUSE; MULE DEER; DIET; NUTRITION; RICHNESS; FOODS;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-010-9530-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt.) occupies large portions of the western United States and provides valuable wildlife habitat. However, information is lacking quantifying differences in native perennial forb characteristics between mountain big sagebrush [A. tridentata spp. vaseyana (Rydb.) Beetle] and Wyoming big sagebrush [A. tridentata spp. wyomingensis (Beetle & A. Young) S.L. Welsh] plant communities. This information is critical to accurately evaluate the quality of habitat and forage that these communities can produce because many wildlife species consume large quantities of native perennial forbs and depend on them for hiding cover. To compare native perennial forb characteristics on sites dominated by these two subspecies of big sagebrush, we sampled 106 intact big sagebrush plant communities. Mountain big sagebrush plant communities produced almost 4.5-fold more native perennial forb biomass and had greater native perennial forb species richness and diversity compared to Wyoming big sagebrush plant communities (P < 0.001). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMS) and the multiple-response permutation procedure (MRPP) demonstrated that native perennial forb composition varied between these plant communities (P < 0.001). Native perennial forb composition was more similar within plant communities grouped by big sagebrush subspecies than expected by chance (A = 0.112) and composition varied between community groups (P < 0.001). Indicator analysis did not identify any perennial forbs that were completely exclusive and faithful, but did identify several perennial forbs that were relatively good indicators of either mountain big sagebrush or Wyoming big sagebrush plant communities. Our results suggest that management plans and habitat guidelines should recognize differences in native perennial forb characteristics between mountain and Wyoming big sagebrush plant communities.
引用
收藏
页码:452 / 458
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]   PRELAYING NUTRITION OF SAGE GROUSE HENS IN OREGON [J].
BARNETT, JK ;
CRAWFORD, JA .
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1994, 47 (02) :114-118
[3]  
Blaisdell J.P., 1982, Managing intermountain rangelands--Sagebrush-grass ranges
[4]   FEEDING-BEHAVIOR AND HABITAT SELECTION OF MULE DEER AND ELK ON NORTHERN UTAH SUMMER RANGE [J].
COLLINS, WB ;
URNESS, PJ .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1983, 47 (03) :646-663
[5]  
Connelly JW, 2000, WILDLIFE SOC B, V28, P967
[6]   Environmental and vegetation relationships of the Artemisia tridentata spp. wyomingensis alliance [J].
Davies, K. W. ;
Bates, J. D. ;
Miller, R. F. .
JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 2007, 70 (03) :478-494
[7]   Interaction of historical and nonhistorical disturbances maintains native plant communities [J].
Davies, K. W. ;
Svejcar, T. J. ;
Bates, J. D. .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2009, 19 (06) :1536-1545
[8]   Vegetation characteristics across part of the Wyoming big sagebrush alliance [J].
Davies, Kirk W. ;
Bates, Jonatban D. ;
Miller, Ricbard E. .
RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2006, 59 (06) :567-575
[9]  
Dufrene M, 1997, ECOL MONOGR, V67, P345, DOI 10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0345:SAAIST]2.0.CO
[10]  
2