Exploration of life cycle data calculation: Lessons from a Passivhaus case study

被引:21
作者
Din, Asif [1 ]
Brotas, Luisa [2 ]
机构
[1] London Metropolitan Univ, Sir John Cass Fac Art Architecture & Design, London, England
[2] London Metropolitan Univ, Sir John Cass Fac Art Architecture & Design, Low Energy Architecture Res Unit, London, England
关键词
LCA; Embodied carbon data; WRAP; Buildings; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; EMBODIED ENERGY; FAMILY HOUSE; CONSTRUCTION; UK; PERFORMANCE; DWELLINGS; RETROFIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.02.032
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Executing a life cycle carbon analysis on a building has two components to consider: the Embodied Carbon (EC) and In-use Carbon, the sum of these forms 'the building carbon budget'. The in-use can be obtained through regulatory tools such as the Standard Assessment Procedure (SAP) in the UK. Embodied carbon has a loose framework with little guidance on a standardised methodology. This paper explores embodied carbon analysis using building components to enhance the understanding of the sensitivity and categorisation of measurements to propose a methodology. The exploration of differing methods on a Passivhaus case study was undertaken with the use of global warming potential identified as the correct unit of measurement. Different methods of estimating quantities and datasets used for an EC calculation are discussed. Results highlight a variation in carbon emissions for certain common building materials between the method used in the Environmental Performance Declarations (EPD) compared to current databases such as Inventory of Carbon and Energy (ICE) using Cradle to Gate data. Designers prefer simple embodied carbon calculation methods. This paper identifies a calculation method giving an acceptable accuracy with the least amount of input data required to implement regulatory standardisation within the industry. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 92
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Energy use during the life cycle of single-unit dwellings: Examples [J].
Adalberth, K .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 32 (04) :321-329
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, BUILD REG STAND ASS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, LOW CARB CONSTR
[4]   Life cycle assessment: A case study of a dwelling home in Scotland [J].
Asif, M. ;
Muneer, T. ;
Kelley, R. .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 42 (03) :1391-1394
[5]   Simulation-based decision support tool for early stages of zero-energy building design [J].
Attia, Shady ;
Gratia, Elisabeth ;
De Herde, Andre ;
Hensen, Jan L. M. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 49 :2-15
[6]   Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules [J].
Aye, Lu ;
Ngo, T. ;
Crawford, R. H. ;
Gammampila, R. ;
Mendis, P. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 47 :159-168
[7]   Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas analysis of three building types in a residential area in Lisbon [J].
Bastos, Joana ;
Batterman, Stuart A. ;
Freire, Fausto .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 69 :344-353
[8]   Energy retrofit of a single-family house: Life cycle net energy saving and environmental benefits [J].
Beccali, Marco ;
Cellura, Maurizio ;
Fontana, Mario ;
Longo, Sonia ;
Mistretta, Marina .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 27 :283-293
[9]   Measuring buildings for sustainability: Comparing the initial and retrofit ecological footprint of a century home - The REEP House [J].
Bin, Guoshu ;
Parker, Paul .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2012, 93 :24-32
[10]   The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings [J].
Blengini, Gian Andrea ;
Di Carlo, Tiziana .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2010, 42 (06) :869-880