Recurrence after successful percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy

被引:150
作者
Kim, J. M.
Lee, S. H.
Ahn, Y.
Yoon, D. H.
Lee, C. D.
Lim, S. T.
机构
[1] Gimpo Airport Wooridul Spine Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Wooridul Spine Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Wooridul Spine Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Wooridul Spine Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Successful PELD; recurrent disc herniation; Modic change; protrusion; DISC HERNIATION; ARTHROSCOPIC MICRODISCECTOMY; SURGERY; REOPERATION; MANAGEMENT; MARROW;
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-982504
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study is to investigate the risk factors for recurrence after successful percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). Recently, PELD has become the most common surgical technique. However, there are only a few studies on the factors causing the reappearance of the symptoms. Between January 2002 and December 2004, 42 patients with recurrent disc herniation after successful PELD were classified as a recurrent group and 42 patients who underwent PELD with a satisfactory result were randomly selected for a non-recurrent group. For all the patients, we analyzed the medical records and radiological studies retrospectively. The patients' mean age was 47.4 years (range: 18-76) in the recurrent group, while the mean age of the non-recurrent group was 34.4 years (range: 17-66) (p=0.001). The body mass index was 24.9 in the recurrent group and 22.9 in the non-recurrent group (p=0.006). On the radiological studies, the protrusion (p=0.013) and the presence of Modic change (p = 0.003) were more frequent in the recurrent group. For the successful PELD, it is desirable for the surgeon to consider the above risk factors carefully.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 85
页数:4
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF MICROSURGICAL AND STANDARD LUMBAR DISCECTOMY [J].
ANDREWS, DW ;
LAVYNE, MH .
SPINE, 1990, 15 (04) :329-335
[2]   Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: The effects of fragment type and anular competence [J].
Carragee, EJ ;
Han, MY ;
Suen, PW ;
Kim, D .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A (01) :102-108
[3]  
Chiu JC, 2000, PRACTICE MINIMALLY I, P227
[4]   Ipsilateral recurrent lumbar disc herniation - A prospective, controlled study [J].
Cinotti, G ;
Roysam, GS ;
Eisenstein, SM ;
Postacchini, F .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1998, 80B (05) :825-832
[5]  
Connolly E S, 1992, Clin Neurosurg, V39, P211
[6]   OBSERVATIONS ON MANAGEMENT OF FAILED SPINAL OPERATIONS [J].
CROCK, HV .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1976, 58 (02) :193-199
[7]   MICROSURGICAL REOPERATION FOLLOWING LUMBAR-DISK SURGERY - TIMING, SURGICAL FINDINGS, AND OUTCOME IN 92 PATIENTS [J].
EBELING, U ;
KALBARCYK, H ;
REULEN, HJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1989, 70 (03) :397-404
[8]   REOPERATION AFTER LUMBAR DISC SURGERY - RESULTS IN 130 CASES [J].
FANDINO, J ;
BOTANA, C ;
VILADRICH, A ;
GOMEZBUENO, J .
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 1993, 122 (1-2) :102-104
[9]   A prospective, randomized study comparing the results of open discectomy with those of video-assisted arthroscopic microdiscectomy [J].
Hermantin, FU ;
Peters, T ;
Quartararo, L ;
Kambin, P .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1999, 81A (07) :958-965
[10]   RECURRENT LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION - RESULTS OF REPEAT LAMINECTOMY AND DISKECTOMY [J].
HERRON, L .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 1994, 7 (02) :161-166