Does government institutional reform deter corporate tax evasion? Evidence from China

被引:2
作者
Xu, Junbing [1 ]
Zhu, Minling [2 ]
Song, Shengying [3 ]
Wu, Yunxi [4 ]
机构
[1] Minjiang Univ, NewHuadu Business Sch, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Agr Univ, Econ Coll, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Jimei Univ, Inst Finance & Econ, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples R China
[4] Fuzhou Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
AVOIDANCE; ENFORCEMENT; INCENTIVES; OWNERSHIP; AUDIT; IRS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0273372
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Exploiting the quasi-natural experiment of the social insurance collection system reform implemented in China in 2000, based on data from China's industrial enterprise database from 1998 to 2006, we use the difference-in-differences method to test the impact of changing the social insurance collection institution on corporate tax evasion. We find that changing the social insurance collection institution from the social security department to the local tax department significantly deters corporate tax evasion. A series of robustness tests also support this conclusion. The reason is changing the social insurance collection institution to the local tax department increases its' social insurance information of the enterprise, and reduces the information asymmetry between the enterprise and the collection institution. Furthermore, we find that the impact of changing the social insurance collection institution on corporate tax evasion is more evident in the samples of labor-intensive enterprises, low labor cost enterprises, and enterprises under the jurisdiction of the local tax department. These results indicate that government institutional reform is a valid way to reduce the information asymmetry between the government and enterprises, which will finally deter corporate tax evasion.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Ali M., 2015, ICTD Working Paper 31, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.2587857, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2587857]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, 0724 A YOUNG SCH POL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, TAX NOTES
[4]   The incentives for tax planning [J].
Armstrong, Christopher S. ;
Blouin, Jennifer L. ;
Larcker, David F. .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2012, 53 (1-2) :391-411
[5]   Home Country Tax System Characteristics and Corporate Tax Avoidance: International Evidence [J].
Atwood, T. J. ;
Drake, Michael S. ;
Myers, James N. ;
Myers, Linda A. .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2012, 87 (06) :1831-1860
[6]  
Austin CR, 2017, J AM TAX ASSOC, V39, P67, DOI 10.2308/atax-51634
[7]   Is Tax Avoidance Associated with Economically Significant Rent Extraction among US Firms? [J].
Blaylock, Bradley S. .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2016, 33 (03) :1013-1043
[8]  
Bott, 2014, 262014 DEP EC NORW S
[9]  
Carrillo, 2016, ANN BANK C DEV EC AB
[10]   Tax compliance and enforcement in the pampas evidence from a field experiment [J].
Castro, Lucio ;
Scartascini, Carlos .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2015, 116 :65-82