Identifying a set that contains the best dynamic treatment regimes

被引:29
|
作者
Ertefaie, Ashkan [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Tianshuang [3 ]
Lynch, Kevin G. [4 ,5 ]
Nahum-Shani, Inbal [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Stat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Ctr Pharmacoepidemiol Res & Training, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Stat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Treatment Res Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Psychiat, Ctr Studies Addict, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Inst Social Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Double robust; Marginal structural model; Multiple comparisons with the best; SMART designs; SIMULTANEOUS CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; MARGINAL STRUCTURAL MODELS; CAUSAL INFERENCE; DESIGN; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1093/biostatistics/kxv025
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A dynamic treatment regime (DTR) is a treatment design that seeks to accommodate patient heterogeneity in response to treatment. DTRs can be operationalized by a sequence of decision rules that map patient information to treatment options at specific decision points. The sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) is a trial design that was developed specifically for the purpose of obtaining data that informs the construction of good (i.e. efficacious) decision rules. One of the scientific questions motivating a SMART concerns the comparison of multiple DTRs that are embedded in the design. Typical approaches for identifying the best DTRs involve all possible comparisons between DTRs that are embedded in a SMART, at the cost of greatly reduced power to the extent that the number of embedded DTRs (EDTRs) increase. Here, we propose a method that will enable investigators to use SMART study data more efficiently to identify the set that contains the most efficacious EDTRs. Our method ensures that the true best EDTRs are included in this set with at least a given probability. Simulation results are presented to evaluate the proposed method, and the Extending Treatment Effectiveness of Naltrexone SMART study data are analyzed to illustrate its application.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 148
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bayesian set of best dynamic treatment regimes: Construction and sample size calculation for SMARTs with binary outcomes
    Artman, William J.
    Johnson, Brent A.
    Lynch, Kevin G.
    McKay, James R.
    Ertefaie, Ashkan
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 41 (09) : 1688 - 1708
  • [2] Dynamic Treatment Regimes
    Chakraborty, Bibhas
    Murphy, Susan A.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF STATISTICS AND ITS APPLICATION, VOL 1, 2014, 1 : 447 - U1025
  • [3] Evaluation of Viable Dynamic Treatment Regimes in a Sequentially Randomized Trial of Advanced Prostate Cancer
    Wang, Lu
    Rotnitzky, Andrea
    Lin, Xihong
    Millikan, Randall E.
    Thall, Peter F.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 107 (498) : 493 - 508
  • [4] Predictive Bayesian inference and dynamic treatment regimes
    Saarela, Olli
    Arjas, Elja
    Stephens, David A.
    Moodie, Erica E. M.
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 57 (06) : 941 - 958
  • [6] Dynamic treatment regimes with interference
    Jiang, Cong
    Wallace, Michael P.
    Thompson, Mary E.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS-REVUE CANADIENNE DE STATISTIQUE, 2023, 51 (02): : 469 - 502
  • [7] Interpretable Dynamic Treatment Regimes
    Zhang, Yichi
    Laber, Eric B.
    Davidian, Marie
    Tsiatis, Anastasios A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 113 (524) : 1541 - 1549
  • [8] Optimization of individualized dynamic treatment regimes for recurrent diseases
    Huang, Xuelin
    Ning, Jing
    Wahed, Abdus S.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (14) : 2363 - 2378
  • [9] Regret-Regression for Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes
    Henderson, Robin
    Ansell, Phil
    Alshibani, Deyadeen
    BIOMETRICS, 2010, 66 (04) : 1192 - 1201
  • [10] Bayesian inference for optimal dynamic treatment regimes in practice
    Duque, Daniel Rodriguez
    Moodie, Erica E. M.
    Stephens, David A. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2023, 19 (02): : 309 - 331