Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative

被引:250
作者
Rank, J
Pace, VL
Frese, M
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Psychol, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[2] Univ Giessen, D-35390 Giessen, Germany
来源
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE | 2004年 / 53卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00185.x
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Creativity, innovation, and initiative are psychological processes that facilitate the transformation of individual work roles, teams, and organisations into desired future states. Therefore, the present paper focuses on potential research trends in this increasingly important area. Specifically, we identify three substantive gaps reflecting the needs for greater process differentiation, concept integration, and cross-cultural analysis. First, potential differential antecedents of specific creativity or innovation phases have received insufficient attention. Second, the creativity and innovation research domain may benefit from an integration of recently developed proactivity concepts such as personal initiative and voice behavior. Third, cross-cultural differences in values, motivational orientations, and leadership preferences may determine how creativity and innovation are enacted and cultivated across the globe. With respect to each of these future challenges, we provide suggestions for theoretical and empirical advancements and discuss potential practical and methodological developments.
引用
收藏
页码:518 / 528
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Amabile T.M., 1996, Creativity in context: The social psychology of creativity
[2]   Assessing the work environment for creativity [J].
Amabile, TM ;
Conti, R ;
Coon, H ;
Lazenby, J ;
Herron, M .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 39 (05) :1154-1184
[3]  
[Anonymous], INT REV IND ORG PSYC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, CREATIVE ACTION ORG
[5]   Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance [J].
Baer, M ;
Frese, M .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2003, 24 (01) :45-68
[6]  
BRETT JM, 1997, NEW PERSPECTIVES INT, P676
[7]   CHANGING WORK ENVIRONMENTS - INNOVATIVE COPING RESPONSES TO OCCUPATIONAL STRESS [J].
BUNCE, D ;
WEST, M .
WORK AND STRESS, 1994, 8 (04) :319-331
[8]  
DAMANPOUR F, 1991, ACAD MANAGE J, V34, P555, DOI 10.5465/256406
[9]   Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed? [J].
Den Hartog, DN ;
House, RJ ;
Hanges, PJ ;
Ruiz-Quintanilla, SA ;
Dorfman, PW ;
Abdalla, IA ;
Adetoun, BS ;
Aditya, RN ;
Agourram, H ;
Akande, A ;
Akande, BE ;
Akerblom, S ;
Altschul, C ;
Alvarez-Backus, E ;
Andrews, J ;
Arias, ME ;
Arif, MS ;
Ashkanasy, NM ;
Asllani, A ;
Audia, G ;
Bakacsi, G ;
Bendova, H ;
Beveridge, D ;
Bhagat, RS ;
Blacutt, A ;
Bao, JM ;
Bodega, D ;
Bodur, M ;
Booth, S ;
Bourantas, D ;
Brenk, K ;
Brodbeck, F ;
Carl, DE ;
Castel, P ;
Chang, CC ;
Chau, S ;
Cheung, F ;
Chhokar, JS ;
Chiu, J ;
Cosgriff, P ;
Dastmalchian, A ;
Dela Coleta, JA ;
Dela Coleta, MF ;
Deneire, M ;
Dickson, M ;
Donnelly-Cox, G ;
Earley, C ;
Elgamal, MAE ;
Erez, M ;
Falkus, S .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 1999, 10 (02) :219-256
[10]  
DENZIN NormanK., 2013, LANDSCAPE QUALITATIV, V4th