Effect of positive surgical margins on biochemical failure, biochemical recurrence-free survival, and overall survival after radical prostatectomy: Median long-term results

被引:1
作者
Huri, Emre [1 ]
Aydogmus, Yasin [2 ]
Doluoglu, Omer Gokhan [1 ]
Dadali, Mumtaz [1 ]
Karakan, Tolga [1 ]
Emir, Levent [1 ]
Germiyanoglu, Cankon [1 ]
机构
[1] Clin Ankara Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, TR-06340 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Children Hlth & Dis Training & Res Hosp, Clin Dr Sami Ulus Matern, Dept Urol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Biochemical failure; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasm; Survival; CANCER-SPECIFIC SURVIVAL; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; ANTIGEN RECURRENCE; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; SEMINAL-VESICLE; GLEASON SCORE; IMPACT; PROGRESSION; PREDICTORS; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.kjms.2014.04.001
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate the median long-term effects of positive surgical margin (PSM) and other prognostic factors on biochemical recurrence-free survival, overall survival, and biochemical failure in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Our study included 121 patients with pT2-3N0 disease treated between March 2006 and August 2012. The patients were divided into two groups: those with PSM and those with negative surgical margin (NSM). We analyzed the age, clinical and pathological stages, preoperative and postoperative Gleason scores, duration of the follow-up, adjuvant chemo-/radiotherapy, biochemical failure, biochemical recurrence-free survival, and overall survival in these patients. PSM was found in 25 (20%) patients, whereas 96 patients had NSM. The median follow-up time was 46.6 months (range 12-72 months) for the PSM group and 48.3 months (range 7-149 months) for the NSM group. The biochemical failure rate was 24% in the PSM group and 8.3% in the NSM group (p = 0.029). The biochemical recurrence-free survival was found as 76% in the PSM group and 91.7% in the NSM group. The difference between the groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.06). The overall survival was 100% in both groups. The surgical margins of the radical prostatectomy material is an important pathological indicator for biochemical failure at mid long-term follow-up. We did not find any effect of PSM on overall survival or biochemical recurrence-free survival. Copyright (C) 2014, Kaohsiung Medical University. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:510 / 514
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Stage-by-Stage Effects of Surgical Margin Status on Biochemical Failure after Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer [J].
Akdemir, Alp Ozgur ;
Ozden, Cuneyt ;
Oztekin, Cetin Volkan ;
Aktas, Binhan Kagan ;
Cetinkaya, Mesut ;
Memis, All ;
Doluoglu, Omer Gokhan .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2011, 86 (02) :156-160
[2]   Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy [J].
Blute, ML ;
Bergstralh, EJ ;
Iocca, A ;
Scherer, B ;
Zincke, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (01) :119-125
[3]   Clinicopathological predictors of systemic progression and prostate cancer mortality in patients with a positive surgical margin at radical prostatectomy [J].
Boorjian, S. A. ;
Tollefson, M. K. ;
Rangel, L. J. ;
Bergstralh, E. J. ;
Karnes, R. J. .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2012, 15 (01) :56-62
[4]   Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Multiplicative Interaction Between Surgical Margin Status and Pathological Stage [J].
Budaeus, Lars ;
Isbarn, Hendrik ;
Eichelberg, Christian ;
Lughezzani, Giovanni ;
Sun, Maxine ;
Perrotte, Paul ;
Chun, Felix K. H. ;
Salomon, Georg ;
Steuber, Thomas ;
Koellermann, Jens ;
Sauter, Guido ;
Ahyai, Sascha A. ;
Zacharias, Mario ;
Fisch, Margit ;
Schlomm, Thorsten ;
Haese, Alexander ;
Heinzer, Hans ;
Huland, Hartwig ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (04) :1341-1346
[5]   Cancer recurrence and survival rates after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: Intermediate-term results [J].
Catalona, WJ ;
Smith, DS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (06) :2428-2434
[6]   Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality [J].
Chalfin, Heather J. ;
Dinizo, Michael ;
Trock, Bruce J. ;
Feng, Zhaoyong ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Walsh, Patrick C. ;
Humphreys, Elizabeth ;
Han, Misop .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (11) :1684-1689
[7]  
Djavan Bob, 2003, European Urology, V43, P12, DOI 10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00505-5
[8]   Incidence and significance of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens [J].
Epstein, JI .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1996, 23 (04) :651-&
[9]   Prognostic implications of a positive apical margin in radical prostatectomy specimens [J].
Fesseha, T ;
Sakr, W ;
Grignon, D ;
Banerjee, M ;
Wood, DP ;
Pontes, JE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (06) :2176-2179
[10]   Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy - The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience [J].
Han, M ;
Partin, AW ;
Pound, CR ;
Epstein, JI ;
Walsh, PC .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 28 (03) :555-+