Comparison of penalized logistic regression models for rare event case

被引:4
|
作者
Olmus, Hulya [1 ]
Nazman, Ezgi [1 ]
Erbas, Semra [2 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Stat, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Univ Kyrenia, Fac Arts & Sci, Karakum, Northern Cyprus, Turkey
关键词
Firth LR; FLIC; FLAC; Rare event; Predicted probability bias; BIAS; ESTIMATORS; REDUCTION; RATIO;
D O I
10.1080/03610918.2019.1676438
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
The occurrence rate of the event of interest might be quite small (rare) in some cases, although sample size is large enough for Binary Logistic Regression (LR) model. In studies where the sample size is not large enough, the parameters to be estimated might be biased because of rare event case. Parameter estimations of LR model are usually obtained using Newton?Raphson (NR) algorithm for Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE). It is known that these estimations are usually biased in small samples but asymptotically unbiased. On the other hand, initial parameter values are sensitive for parameter estimation in NR for MLE. Our aim of the study is to present an approach on parameter estimation bias using inverse conditional distributions based on distribution assumption giving true parameter values and to compare this approach on different penalized LR methods. With this aim, LR, Firth LR, FLIC and FLAC methods were compared in terms of parameter estimation bias, predicted probability bias and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) for different sample sizes, event and correlation rates conducting a detailed Monte Carlo simulation study. Findings suggest that FLIC method should be preferred in rare event and small sample cases.
引用
收藏
页码:1578 / 1590
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Strategies for testing statistical and practical significance in detecting DIF with logistic regression models
    Fidalgo, Angel M.
    Alavi, Seyed Mohammad
    Amirian, Seyed Mohammad Reza
    LANGUAGE TESTING, 2014, 31 (04) : 433 - 451
  • [22] A study on the effects of unbalanced data when fitting logistic regression models in ecology
    Salas-Eljatib, Christian
    Fuentes-Ramirez, Andres
    Gregoire, Timothy G.
    Altamirano, Adison
    Yaitul, Valeska
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 85 : 502 - 508
  • [23] Adjusting for Confounding in Early Postlaunch Settings Going Beyond Logistic Regression Models
    Schmidt, Amand F.
    Klungel, Olaf H.
    Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 27 (01) : 133 - 142
  • [24] Dealing with the Phenomenon of Quasi-complete Separation and a Goodness of Fit Test in Logistic Regression Models in the Case of Long Data Sets
    Vassiliadis, V. G.
    Spyroglou, I. I.
    Rigas, A. G.
    Rosenberg, J. R.
    Lindsay, K. A.
    STATISTICS IN BIOSCIENCES, 2019, 11 (03) : 567 - 596
  • [25] The alarming problems of confounding equivalence using logistic regression models in the perspective of causal diagrams
    Yu, Yuanyuan
    Li, Hongkai
    Sun, Xiaoru
    Su, Ping
    Wang, Tingting
    Liu, Yi
    Yuan, Zhongshang
    Liu, Yanxun
    Xue, Fuzhong
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [26] Testing Inference from Logistic Regression Models in Data with Unobserved Heterogeneity at Cluster Levels
    Ayis, Salma
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2009, 38 (06) : 1202 - 1211
  • [27] Feature selection with interactions in logistic regression models using multivariate synergies for a GWAS application
    Xu, Easton Li
    Qian, Xiaoning
    Yu, Qilian
    Zhang, Han
    Cui, Shuguang
    BMC GENOMICS, 2018, 19
  • [28] Alternatives to Logistic Regression Models when Analyzing Cluster Randomized Trials with Binary Outcomes
    Huang, Francis L.
    PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2023, 24 (03) : 398 - 407
  • [29] Conditional or unconditional logistic regression for frequency matched case-control design?
    Wan, Fei
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 41 (06) : 1023 - 1041
  • [30] Comparison of neural network and logistic regression for dementia prediction: results from the PREADViSE trial
    Ding, Xiuhua
    Schmitt, Frederick
    Kryscio, Richard
    Charnigo, Richard
    JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2021, 69 (02): : 137 - 146