Nonlinear hydrodynamic analysis and optimization of oscillating wave surge converters under irregular waves

被引:10
作者
Liu, Yao [1 ]
Mizutani, Norimi [1 ]
Cho, Yong-Hwan [1 ]
Nakamura, Tomoaki [1 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Chikusa Ku, Furo Cho, Nagoya, Aichi 4648603, Japan
关键词
Nonlinear hydrodynamic analysis; MOGA optimization; OWSC; Shallow water; PTO system; Mean annual CWR; ENERGY CONVERTERS; DESIGN; MODEL; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110888
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
To evaluate the mean annual capture width ratio (CWR) of the oscillating wave surge converters (OWSCs) under irregular waves, the time-domain dynamic equation was derived by considering the nonlinear hydrostatic stiffness, drag, and nonlinear power take-off (PTO) system. A Python code was developed to solve the response and capture performance with 4th-order Runge-Kutta integration. The wave spectrum was corrected according to the water depth in shallow water. Unlike the inflexible drag coefficients in steady flow, the drag coefficients in irregular waves (calibrated with OpenFOAM) are strongly affected by OWSC thickness. Multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) optimization of OWSC geometric sizes, internal water filling, and PTO parameters was conducted for two objective functions: maximizing the mean annual CWR and minimizing the structural mass per unit width. The optimized result presents a slender OWSC that neutrally balances these two objectives. The effects and local sensitivities of the width, thickness, axis depth, water filling, PTO stiffness, damping, and friction were comprehensively discussed. The results show that the axis depth has the greatest positive influence on the CWR, and the increase of thickness creates significant economical disadvantage due to a heavier structure. However, inertia adjustment by filling water does not benefit the mean annual CWR.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [31] Prediction and optimization of oscillating wave surge converter using machine learning techniques
    Liu, Zhenqing
    Wang, Yize
    Hua, Xugang
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 210
  • [32] Numerical modelling of the CECO wave energy converter
    Lopez, M.
    Taveira-Pinto, F.
    Rosa-Santos, P.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2017, 113 : 202 - 210
  • [33] A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR SELECTING VALUES OF INPUT VARIABLES IN THE ANALYSIS OF OUTPUT FROM A COMPUTER CODE
    MCKAY, MD
    BECKMAN, RJ
    CONOVER, WJ
    [J]. TECHNOMETRICS, 1979, 21 (02) : 239 - 245
  • [34] Mitchell M., 1998, An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms. Complex Adaptive Systems
  • [35] Mitsuyasu H., 1970, PROC 17 JPN C COASTA
  • [36] National Maritime Research Institute Japan, STAT DAT WIND WAV JA
  • [37] Newman J.N., 2018, MARINE HYDRODYNAMICS, P253
  • [38] Plummer A., 2009, Proceedings of the eight European wave and tidal energy conference, Uppsala, P729
  • [39] How does Oyster work? The simple interpretation of Oyster mathematics
    Renzi, E.
    Doherty, K.
    Henry, A.
    Dias, F.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICS B-FLUIDS, 2014, 47 : 124 - 131
  • [40] Hydrodynamics of the oscillating wave surge converter in the open ocean
    Renzi, E.
    Dias, F.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICS B-FLUIDS, 2013, 41 : 1 - 10