Prevailing Approaches and Practices of Citizen Participation in Smart City Projects: Lessons from Trondheim, Norway

被引:28
作者
Gohari, Savis [1 ]
Baer, Daniela [2 ]
Nielsen, Brita Fladvad [1 ]
Gilcher, Elena [3 ]
Situmorang, Welfry Zwestin [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Architecture & Planning, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
[2] SINTEF, Dept Architecture Mat & Struct, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
[3] Ruhr Univ Bochum RUB, Urban & Metropolitan Studies, Dept Geog, Fac Geosci, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
关键词
smart city; citizen participation; legitimacy; democracy; +CityxChange; Trondheim; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; GOVERNANCE; DEMOCRACY; LEGITIMACY; POLITICS; FUTURE; CITIES;
D O I
10.3390/infrastructures5040036
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Citizen participation has become an important aspect in the design of smart cities. This paper investigates the frame and modality of citizen participation in a European Horizon2020 smart city project, +CityxChange, in Trondheim. +CityxChange aims at enabling citizen participation and co-creation in the transition to a positive energy city. The question is "what are the prevailing approaches and practices in relation to citizen participation amongst the key actors involved in +CityxChange? Which structures and processes have inhibited or fostered the participation mechanisms (e.g., for, by, and of people) and practices in Trondheim?" Through participatory observations and interviews with key local actors and citizens, we found that the focus of +CityxChange on efficiency and creating innovative solutions "for" people in partnership with the private sector has disturbed the "by" and "of" people mechanisms of participation. Citizens' power and roles are not delegated to challenge or replace the project's predetermined issue or plan. The anchorage of the project outside of the formal administrative structure has caused other functional barriers that inhibit citizen participation, rather than facilitate it. This paper discusses the causal relationships between these interconnected barriers and suggests how authorities can possibly overcome them.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, WHAT IS SMART CITY C
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, WIT T ECOL ENV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Healthy environment, healthy lives: how the environment influences health and well-being in Europe, P1, DOI DOI 10.2800/53670
[4]  
Arnstein S., 1996, CITY READER, P238
[5]   The politics of sustainability transitions [J].
Avelino, Flor ;
Grin, John ;
Pel, Bonno ;
Jhagroe, Shivant .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2016, 18 (05) :557-567
[6]   CO-GOVERNING SMART CITIES THROUGH LIVING LABS. TOP EVIDENCES FROM EU [J].
Bifulco, Francesco ;
Tregua, Marco ;
Amitrano, Cristina C. .
TRANSYLVANIAN REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2017, (50E) :21-37
[7]  
Boedeltje Mijke., 2004, NIG ANN WORK C 2004
[8]   CROWDSOURCING THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS FOR PLANNING PROJECTS [J].
Brabham, Daren C. .
PLANNING THEORY, 2009, 8 (03) :242-262
[9]   Making plans that matter - Citizen involvement and government action [J].
Burby, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2003, 69 (01) :33-49
[10]   Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: The neoliberal logic of 'citizen-focused' smart cities in Europe [J].
Cardullo, Paolo ;
Kitchin, Rob .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-POLITICS AND SPACE, 2019, 37 (05) :813-830