Assessment of measurement uncertainty for quantitative methods of analysis: Comparative assessment of the precision (uncertainty) of bacterial colony counts

被引:32
作者
Jarvis, Basil
Hedges, Alan J.
Corry, Janet E. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Vet Clin Sci, Langford BS40 5DU, England
[2] Ross Biosci Ltd, Upton Bishop HR9 7UR, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Dept Cellular & Mol Med, Bristol BS8 1TD, Avon, England
关键词
measurement uncertainty; precision; bacterial colony counts; weighted means; repeatability; reproducibility;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.12.037
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
An interlaboratory trial was made, by three analysts in each of the 19 laboratories, of three International Standards Organisation (ISO) colony count methods for aerobic organisms (ACC), Enterobacteriaceae (ECC) and Escherichia coli (EcCC). All tests were done in duplicate and were further replicated by plating both on culture media supplied by the organisers and on each laboratory's own choice of culture media. In order to avoid any influence of food matrix on the results, the inoculum for each test was a freeze-dried ampoule of a standardised mixed culture. After collation of test results, individual data sets were examined for obvious non-consistency, and colony counts for each individual test were determined both as simple and 'weighted' mean values. The derived colony Counts were then log(10)-transformed and examined statistically. Estimates of repeatability and reproducibility for each set of results were derived and used to calculate the parameters for the uncertainty of measurement. Estimated values of the uncertainty of reproducibility and repeatability for the ACC ranged, respectively, from 9.3 to 12.1 % and 2.0 to 3.9% of the mean log(10) colony count, depending on the specific culture media, the method of deriving the mean count and the statistical procedure employed. Similarly, estimates of the uncertainty of reproducibility and repeatability for the ECC ranged, respectively, from 14.0 to 17.4% and 4.1 to 6.7%. The estimates of uncertainty of reproducibility and repeatability for the EcCC data ranged, respectively, from 21.1 to 30.9% and 6.7 to 15.4%. Whilst the uncertainty estimates for the ACC data conform to long-held views on the repeatability and reproducibility of microbial count data, the estimates for the ECC and EcCC are considerably greater. It was notable that no benefits were seen in the use of the weighted mean as compared to simple mean colony count. The importance of uncertainty estimates of colony count data in the assessment of the microbiological quality of foods is discussed. (c) 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 51
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, OJ L, V338, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-385007-2.00012-7
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, 215282 ISO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, 166492 ISO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1989, ANALYST, V114, P1693, DOI DOI 10.1039/AN9891401693
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, 16140 ISO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1994, 57253 ISO
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1999, 68871 ISO
[8]   Lessons from the organization of a proficiency testing program in food microbiology by interlaboratory comparison: Analytical methods in use, impact of methods on bacterial counts and measurement uncertainty of bacterial counts [J].
Augustin, JC ;
Carlier, V .
FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 23 (01) :1-38
[9]   A critical review of measurement uncertainty in the enumeration of food micro-organisms [J].
Corry, Janet E. L. ;
Jarvis, Basil ;
Passmore, Sue ;
Hedges, Alan .
FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 24 (03) :230-253
[10]  
CORRY JEL, FOOD MICROBIOLOGY